Ferreira A M, Pires C R, Moron A F, Araujo Júnior E, Traina E, Mattar R
Obstetrics Department of Sao Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;98(2):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
To compare uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) and flow velocity wave (FVW) patterns between women with no history of abortion and women with recurrent pregnancy loss of unexplained cause.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 43 women with recurrent pregnancy loss and 43 women with no history of abortion and at least 1 child born at term (control group). Transvaginal ultrasonography with uterine artery Doppler evaluation was performed in the second phase of the menstrual cycle to calculate the PI and analyze the FVW pattern.
The women with recurrent pregnancy loss had a significantly higher uterine artery PI than those in the control group (2.71+/-0.54 and 2.30+/-0.44, respectively), as well as a higher incidence of FVWs of the A and B types.
Compared with the control group, a higher PI and a higher incidence of FVW of the A and B types--and thus a higher uterine artery impedance--were found among women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
比较无流产史女性与原因不明复发性流产女性的子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)及血流速度波形(FVW)模式。
对43例复发性流产女性和43例无流产史且至少有1例足月分娩子女的女性(对照组)进行横断面研究。在月经周期的第二阶段进行经阴道超声检查及子宫动脉多普勒评估,以计算PI并分析FVW模式。
复发性流产女性的子宫动脉PI显著高于对照组(分别为2.71±0.54和2.30±0.44),且A型和B型FVW的发生率更高。
与对照组相比,复发性流产女性的PI更高,A型和B型FVW的发生率更高,即子宫动脉阻力更高。