Lock S H, Paul E A, Rudd R M, Wedzicha J A
Department of Thoracic Medicine, London Chest Hospital, U.K.
Respir Med. 1991 Sep;85(5):407-12. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(06)80186-1.
Fifty portable oxygen assessments, based on 6-min walking tests, were reviewed to produce guidelines for assessment and prescription of portable oxygen, and to evaluate factors predicting benefit. Patients with a portable cylinder were questioned about benefits/difficulties and usage of portable oxygen. A significant improvement on the oxygen compared to the air walk was found (median 9.7%) which correlated with the oxygen desaturation on the baseline walk (r = 0.51, P less than 0.05). A placebo effect was demonstrated using an air cylinder (median improvement 6.1%). There was no correlation between improvement in walking distance and decrease in visual analogue scale (VAS) score of breathlessness. We recommend standard portable oxygen assessments based on a series of 6-min walks. Improvements of 10% in walking distance or VAS score from the oxygen to the air walk would lead to the patient being offered a portable oxygen cylinder.
对基于6分钟步行测试的50次便携式氧气评估进行了回顾,以制定便携式氧气评估和处方指南,并评估预测获益的因素。对使用便携式氧气瓶的患者询问了其获益/困难情况以及便携式氧气的使用情况。发现与空气步行相比,吸氧步行有显著改善(中位数为9.7%),这与基线步行时的氧饱和度下降相关(r = 0.51,P<0.05)。使用空气瓶证明了安慰剂效应(中位数改善6.1%)。步行距离的改善与视觉模拟量表(VAS)呼吸困难评分的降低之间没有相关性。我们建议基于一系列6分钟步行进行标准的便携式氧气评估。从吸氧步行到空气步行,步行距离或VAS评分改善10%将使患者获得便携式氧气瓶。