Casal J, De Manuel A, Mateu E, Martín M
Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal, Departament de Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Prev Vet Med. 2007 Nov 15;82(1-2):138-50. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
A survey was conducted on 172 farms belonging to the same company in order to ascertain the biosecurity measures applied and the importance that farmers attributed to each measure. A questionnaire about general data, the opinions of farmers about biosecurity measures, and a detailed checklist of the biosecurity measures actually applied on the farm was completed for each one of the participating farms. Opinion data were initially analysed by means of a cluster analysis (multidimensional scaling method); then, a logistic regression was used to analyse the relationship between the perceptions of the farmer and the measures applied on the farm. In general, farmers implemented measures to reduce risks of contamination from people and animals other than pigs. In contrast, biosecurity measures related to replacement stock were not applied as often. On average, the farmers scored the biosecurity on their own farms as 6.7 on a scale of 0-10. The most important measures, according to the farmers' perceptions, were the availability of a sanitary ford, a fence around the farm, the restriction of visits and vehicles, using bird-proof nets in windows, having changing facilities, applying quarantines, and the use of other measures related to replacement stock. The perception of a given measure was strongly influenced by the measures actually applied on the farm. Thus, for example, those who did not have a sanitary ford highlighted the importance of disinfecting vehicles while those who had one neglected this type of disinfection. In conclusion, knowledge of the relationships between perceptions and measures taken is important in developing effective biosecurity strategies on pig farms.
为了确定所采取的生物安全措施以及养殖户对每项措施的重视程度,对同一家公司旗下的172个养殖场进行了一项调查。针对每个参与调查的养殖场,完成了一份关于一般数据、养殖户对生物安全措施的看法的问卷,以及一份养殖场实际采取的生物安全措施的详细清单。意见数据最初通过聚类分析(多维缩放法)进行分析;然后,使用逻辑回归分析养殖户的认知与养殖场采取的措施之间的关系。总体而言,养殖户实施了一些措施来降低来自人和非猪动物的污染风险。相比之下,与后备种畜相关的生物安全措施实施得并不频繁。平均而言,养殖户给自己养殖场的生物安全打分为6.7分(满分10分)。根据养殖户的认知,最重要的措施包括有一个卫生通道、养殖场周围有围栏、限制人员和车辆来访、窗户使用防鸟网、设有更衣设施、实施隔离措施,以及采取与后备种畜相关的其他措施。对某一特定措施的认知受到养殖场实际采取的措施的强烈影响。因此,例如,那些没有卫生通道的养殖户强调了对车辆进行消毒的重要性,而那些有卫生通道的养殖户则忽略了这类消毒。总之,了解认知与所采取措施之间的关系对于制定有效的猪场生物安全策略很重要。