Lobato Tavares Maria da Fátima, Barros Cláudia Márcia Santos, Marcondes Willer Baumgarten, Bodstein Regina, Cohen Simone Cynamon, Kligerman Debora Cynamon, Comarú Francisco, Silva Carlos Santos, Bógus Cláudia Maria, da Rocha Rosa Maria, de Mello Alexandre Moraes, Adesse Leila, Edmundo Katia, Mendes Rosilda
Sergio Arouca National Pubic Health School, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ), Brazil.
Promot Educ. 2007;Suppl 1:27-30. doi: 10.1177/10253823070140010601x.
Evaluation of health promotion (HP) actions is a major challenge, generating inquiries and reflections that can contribute on the effectiveness of the actions themselves. With the aim on fostering exchange on monitoring and evaluation experiences related to the implementation of healthy settings, the 1 st Brazilian Seminar on Health Promotion Effectiveness was launched in 2005. The program included round table and workshops known as Working Groups (WG) in Brazil. The criteria used to constitute the workshops focused settings as spaces of circulation and living as an intrinsic connection to lifestyles and conditions, as well as to social and/or environmental risk factors associated with groups living in these settings day after day. Focusing on evaluation as an activity that generates knowledge, this article highlights and stimulates the discussion about some major issues arising from the theoretical-methodological approach and the discussions developed in the workshops. The debates carried out during the Seminar illustrated the different perceptions and views of the social players involved in implementation and evaluation of H P practices, disclosing a multiplicity of meanings. It became clear that procedures are needed to document a future maturation of concepts and methods, in combination with further in-depth theoretical discussion.
对健康促进（HP）行动进行评估是一项重大挑战，引发了诸多探讨与思考，这些探讨和思考有助于提升行动本身的有效性。为促进有关健康环境实施的监测与评估经验的交流，2005年举办了首届巴西健康促进有效性研讨会。该活动项目包括在巴西被称为工作组（WG）的圆桌会议和研讨会。用于组建研讨会的标准将环境视为流通和生活的空间，将其视为与生活方式和条件以及与日复一日生活在这些环境中的群体相关的社会和/或环境风险因素的内在联系。本文将评估视为一种产生知识的活动，着重强调并推动了关于理论方法途径以及研讨会上展开的讨论所引发的一些重大问题的讨论。研讨会上进行的辩论展示了参与健康促进实践实施与评估的社会参与者的不同认知和观点，揭示了意义的多样性。显然，需要相关程序来记录概念和方法在未来的成熟过程，并结合进一步深入的理论探讨。
