Sasaki Takashi, Kikuchi Ken, Tanaka Yoshikazu, Takahashi Namiko, Kamata Shinichi, Hiramatsu Keiichi
Department of Infection Control Science, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2770-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00360-07. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
To reclassify phenotypically identified Staphylococcus intermedius strains, which might include true S. intermedius strains and novel species such as Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus delphini, we analyzed molecular phylogenies and phenotypic characteristics of 117 S. intermedius group (SIG) strains tentatively identified as being S. intermedius by the Rapid ID32 Staph assay. From phylogenetic analyses of sodA and hsp60 sequences, the SIG strains were divided into three clusters, which belonged to S. pseudintermedius LMG 22219(T), S. intermedius ATCC 29663(T), and S. delphini LMG 22190(T). All the SIG strains from dogs, cats, and humans were identified as being S. pseudintermedius. The wild pigeon strains, except one, were identified as being S. intermedius, and strains from all domestic pigeons, one wild pigeon, horses, and a mink were identified as being S. delphini. In addition, a phylogenetic analysis of nuc genes revealed that S. delphini strains were divided into two clusters: one was the cluster (S. delphini group A) that belonged to S. delphini LMG 22190(T), and the other was the cluster (S. delphini group B) that was more related to S. pseudintermedius LMG 22219(T) than S. delphini LMG 22190(T). The DNA-DNA hybridization results showed that S. delphini group B strains were distinguished from S. delphini group A, S. intermedius, and S. pseudintermedius strains. S. intermedius is distinguishable from S. pseudintermedius or S. delphini by positive arginine dihydrolase and acid production from beta-gentiobiose and d-mannitol. However, phenotypical characteristics to differentiate S. delphini group A, S. delphini group B, and S. pseudintermedius were not found. In conclusion, SIG strains were reclassified into four clusters with three established and one probably novel species.
为了对表型鉴定的中间葡萄球菌菌株进行重新分类,这些菌株可能包括真正的中间葡萄球菌菌株以及新物种,如伪中间葡萄球菌和海豚葡萄球菌,我们分析了117株通过快速ID32葡萄球菌检测初步鉴定为中间葡萄球菌的中间葡萄球菌属(SIG)菌株的分子系统发育和表型特征。通过对sodA和hsp60序列的系统发育分析,SIG菌株被分为三个簇,分别属于伪中间葡萄球菌LMG 22219(T)、中间葡萄球菌ATCC 29663(T)和海豚葡萄球菌LMG 22190(T)。所有来自狗、猫和人类的SIG菌株均被鉴定为伪中间葡萄球菌。除一株外,野生鸽菌株被鉴定为中间葡萄球菌,所有家鸽、一株野生鸽、马和一只水貂的菌株被鉴定为海豚葡萄球菌。此外,对nuc基因的系统发育分析表明,海豚葡萄球菌菌株分为两个簇:一个是属于海豚葡萄球菌LMG 22190(T)的簇(海豚葡萄球菌A组),另一个是与伪中间葡萄球菌LMG 22219(T)的亲缘关系比与海豚葡萄球菌LMG 22190(T)更近的簇(海豚葡萄球菌B组)。DNA-DNA杂交结果表明,海豚葡萄球菌B组菌株与海豚葡萄球菌A组、中间葡萄球菌和伪中间葡萄球菌菌株不同。中间葡萄球菌可通过精氨酸双水解酶阳性以及由β-龙胆二糖和d-甘露醇产酸与伪中间葡萄球菌或海豚葡萄球菌区分开来。然而,未发现区分海豚葡萄球菌A组、海豚葡萄球菌B组和伪中间葡萄球菌的表型特征。总之,SIG菌株被重新分类为四个簇,包含三个已确定的物种和一个可能的新物种。