• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尿沉渣检查:自动尿液分析系统与手工显微镜检查的比较

Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.

作者信息

Chien Tzu-I, Kao Jau-Tsuen, Liu Hui-Lan, Lin Po-Chang, Hong Jhih-Sian, Hsieh Han-Peng, Chien Miao-Ju

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Sep;384(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.012
PMID:17604012
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several automated instruments examining urine sediment have been introduced. We compared the performance of Sysmex UF-100 and Iris iQ200 with manual microscopy in urine sediment testing.

METHODS

Four hundred and thirty-six urine samples were collected. The urine sediments were examined by manual microscopy and these 2 automated urinalysis systems.

RESULTS

The within-run CVs for urine samples ranged from 3.4% to 22.3% for the iQ200, 1.6% to 24.2% for the UF-100 and 12.5% to 43.9% for manual microscopy. Between-run CVs on quality-control samples ranged from 6.1% to 32.4% for the iQ200 and 3.5% to 24.7% for the UF-100. The agreement between methods was good for red blood cells and white blood cells counts based on r values of 0.935 to 0.968. However, for epithelial cells, the values measured by different systems were poorly correlated (r=0.888-0.922). The Bland-Altman plot indicated a trend towards the automated cell count being greater than the manual microscopy as the epithelial cell count increased. Casts were difficulty differentiated by 2 automated systems.

CONCLUSIONS

These 2 automated urinalysis systems demonstrated good concordance with each other in urine sediment examination. The automated process could be used as a screening procedure but some manual microscopy was still necessary.

摘要

背景

已有多种检测尿沉渣的自动化仪器问世。我们比较了Sysmex UF - 100和Iris iQ200在尿沉渣检测中与手工显微镜检查的性能。

方法

收集了436份尿液样本。通过手工显微镜检查以及这两种自动化尿液分析系统对尿沉渣进行检测。

结果

iQ200对尿液样本的批内变异系数范围为3.4%至22.3%,UF - 100为1.6%至24.2%,手工显微镜检查为12.5%至43.9%。质量控制样本的批间变异系数,iQ200为6.1%至32.4%,UF - 100为3.5%至24.7%。基于0.935至0.968的r值,两种方法在红细胞和白细胞计数方面的一致性良好。然而,对于上皮细胞,不同系统测得的值相关性较差(r = 0.888 - 0.922)。Bland - Altman图表明,随着上皮细胞计数增加,自动化细胞计数有高于手工显微镜检查的趋势。管型在这两种自动化系统中难以区分。

结论

这两种自动化尿液分析系统在尿沉渣检查中相互之间显示出良好的一致性。自动化检测过程可作为一种筛查程序,但仍需要一些手工显微镜检查。

相似文献

1
Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.尿沉渣检查:自动尿液分析系统与手工显微镜检查的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Sep;384(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 May 26.
2
Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers.iQ200全自动尿液显微镜分析仪的分析性能及与使用Fuchs-Rosenthal细胞计数板的手工计数法的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Feb;123(2):290-6.
3
Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.尿沉渣检查:手工法与iQ200全自动尿沉渣分析仪的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2005 Aug;358(1-2):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2005.02.021.
4
[Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer].[iQ200全自动尿液显微镜分析仪的评估]
Korean J Lab Med. 2008 Aug;28(4):267-73. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2008.28.4.267.
5
Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer and comparative study with JCCLS reference method.Sysmex UF-100全自动尿液分析仪的评估及与JCCLS参考方法的对比研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Jun;85 Suppl 1:S246-52.
6
Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.自动化尿液分析:初步经验以及Iris iQ200尿液显微镜检查系统、Sysmex UF-100流式细胞仪与手工显微镜颗粒计数之间的比较
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(9):1251-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.503.
7
A multicenter evaluation of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer body fluids module and comparison with hemacytometer cell counts.Iris iQ200自动尿液显微镜分析仪体液模块的多中心评估及与血细胞计数器细胞计数的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Mar;129(3):445-50. doi: 10.1309/WR1C5WNT6UFXNC6J.
8
Automated urinalysis. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-50.自动尿液分析。Sysmex UF-50的评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2001 Apr;115(4):605-10. doi: 10.1309/RT7X-EMGF-G8AV-TGJ8.
9
Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.Iris iQ200全自动尿液显微镜分析仪的分析性能
Clin Chim Acta. 2006 Oct;372(1-2):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.03.015. Epub 2006 May 11.
10
Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.临床实验室自动化尿液分析:自动显微镜检查、流式细胞术、两种试纸分析仪与尿液沉渣手工显微镜检查之间的比较
J Clin Lab Anal. 2008;22(4):262-70. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20257.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated urine analyzers: a comparative study of Atellica UAS 800 and UAS 60 with risk analysis.自动尿液分析仪:Atellica UAS 800和UAS 60的比较研究及风险分析
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2025 Feb 15;35(1):010707. doi: 10.11613/BM.2025.010707.
2
Dynamically reconfigurable acoustofluidic metasurface for subwavelength particle manipulation and assembly.用于亚波长粒子操控与组装的动态可重构声流体超表面
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 15;16(1):494. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55337-0.
3
Comparison of Labsan Tricell-1000 and Dirui FUS-2000 automated urine analyzers with manual microscopy.
Labsan Tricell-1000和迪瑞FUS-2000自动尿液分析仪与手工显微镜检查的比较。
Pract Lab Med. 2024 Feb 29;39:e00386. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00386. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Assessing Concordance of Results: A Comparative Study of the Manual and Automated Urinalysis Methods.评估结果一致性:手动和自动尿液分析方法的比较研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Apr 20;2024:6963423. doi: 10.1155/2024/6963423. eCollection 2024.
5
Establishing an External Quality Assessment (EQA) Program for Urinalysis in Medical Laboratories of Thailand.为泰国医学实验室的尿液分析建立外部质量评估(EQA)计划。
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2024 Apr;39(2):271-275. doi: 10.1007/s12291-022-01102-3. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
A Comprehensive Survey with Quantitative Comparison of Image Analysis Methods for Microorganism Biovolume Measurements.微生物生物体积测量图像分析方法的定量比较综合调查
Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2023;30(1):639-673. doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09811-x. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
7
Automated urine sediment analyzers underestimate the severity of hematuria in glomerular diseases.自动化尿沉渣分析仪低估了肾小球疾病血尿的严重程度。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 25;11(1):20981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00457-6.
8
A comprehensive review of image analysis methods for microorganism counting: from classical image processing to deep learning approaches.微生物计数图像分析方法综述:从经典图像处理到深度学习方法
Artif Intell Rev. 2022;55(4):2875-2944. doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-10082-4. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
9
A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis.自动尿液分析仪 cobas 6500、UN 3000 - 111b 和 iRICELL 3000 与手工显微镜尿液分析的比较。
Pract Lab Med. 2021 Jan 18;24:e00203. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00203. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Comparative Performance Analysis of Urised 3 and DIRUI FUS-200 Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers and Manual Microscopic Method.Urised 3与迪瑞FUS-200全自动尿沉渣分析仪及手工显微镜法的对比性能分析
Medeni Med J. 2019;34(3):244-251. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2019.23169. Epub 2019 Sep 27.