• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估结果一致性:手动和自动尿液分析方法的比较研究。

Assessing Concordance of Results: A Comparative Study of the Manual and Automated Urinalysis Methods.

机构信息

Department of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2024 Apr 20;2024:6963423. doi: 10.1155/2024/6963423. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/6963423
PMID:38682117
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11055648/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An accurate urine analysis is a good indicator of the status of the renal and genitourinary system. However, limited studies have been done on comparing the diagnostic performance of the fully automated analyser and manual urinalysis especially in Ghana. This study evaluated the concordance of results of the fully automated urine analyser (Sysmex UN series) and the manual method urinalysis at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. . Sixty-seven (67) freshly voided urine samples were analysed by the automated urine analyser Sysmex UN series and by manual examination at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Kappa and Bland-Altman plot analyses were used to evaluate the degree of concordance and correlation of both methods, respectively.

RESULTS

Substantial ( = 0.711, < 0.01), slight ( = 0.193, = 0.004), and slight ( = 0.109, < 0.001) agreements were found for urine colour, appearance, and pH, respectively, between the manual and automated methods. A strong and significant correlation ( = 0.593, < 0.001) was found between both methods for specific gravity with a strong positive linear correlation observed for red blood cell count ( = 0.951, = 0.904, < 0.001), white blood cell count ( = 0.907, = 0.822, < 0.001), and epithelial cell count ( = 0.729, = 0.532, < 0.001). A perfect agreement of urine chemistry results in both methods was observed for nitrite 67 (100%) ( = 1.000, < 0.001) with a fair agreement for protein 46 (68.7%) ( = 0.395, < 0.001). A strong agreement was found in both methods for the presence of cast 65 (97.0%) ( = 0.734, < 0.001) with no concordance observed for the presence of crystals ( = 0.115, = 0.326) and yeast-like cells (YLC) ( = 0.171, = 0.116).

CONCLUSION

The automated and manual methods showed similar performances and good correlation, especially for physical and chemical examination. However, manual microscopy remains necessary to classify urine sediments, particularly for bacteria and yeast-like cells. Future research with larger samples could help validate automated urinalysis for wider clinical use and identify areas requiring improved automated detection capabilities.

摘要

简介

准确的尿液分析是评估肾脏和泌尿生殖系统状况的良好指标。然而,在加纳等国家,关于全自动分析仪与手动尿液分析的诊断性能比较的研究还很有限。本研究评估了全自动尿液分析仪(Sysmex UN 系列)与加纳库马西 Komfo Anokye 教学医院的手动尿液分析方法的结果一致性。对 67 例新鲜排空的尿液样本进行了分析,使用了 Sysmex UN 系列的自动尿液分析仪和手动检查。Kappa 和 Bland-Altman 图分析分别用于评估两种方法的一致性和相关性程度。

结果

手动和自动方法之间在尿液颜色、外观和 pH 值方面分别显示出显著( = 0.711, < 0.01)、轻微( = 0.193, = 0.004)和轻微( = 0.109, < 0.001)的一致性。两种方法之间在比重方面存在强烈且显著的相关性( = 0.593, < 0.001),并且观察到红细胞计数( = 0.951, = 0.904, < 0.001)、白细胞计数( = 0.907, = 0.822, < 0.001)和上皮细胞计数( = 0.729, = 0.532, < 0.001)之间存在强烈的正线性相关性。两种方法在尿液化学结果方面表现出完美的一致性,亚硝酸盐为 67 例(100%)( = 1.000, < 0.001),而蛋白质为 46 例(68.7%)( = 0.395, < 0.001)表现出良好的一致性。两种方法在存在铸型方面均表现出强烈的一致性,65 例(97.0%)( = 0.734, < 0.001),而在存在晶体( = 0.115, = 0.326)和酵母样细胞(YLC)( = 0.171, = 0.116)方面没有一致性。

结论

自动和手动方法表现出相似的性能和良好的相关性,特别是在物理和化学检查方面。然而,手动显微镜仍然是必要的,以对尿液沉淀物进行分类,特别是对细菌和酵母样细胞。未来的研究如果能增加样本量,将有助于验证自动化尿液分析在更广泛的临床应用中的有效性,并确定需要改进自动化检测能力的领域。

相似文献

1
Assessing Concordance of Results: A Comparative Study of the Manual and Automated Urinalysis Methods.评估结果一致性:手动和自动尿液分析方法的比较研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Apr 20;2024:6963423. doi: 10.1155/2024/6963423. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy.两种自动化尿液沉渣分析仪与人工相差显微镜检查的诊断性能比较。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jan 28;58(2):268-273. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0919.
3
Evaluation of the analytical performances of Cobas 6500 and Sysmex UN series automated urinalysis systems with manual microscopic particle counting.评价 Cobas 6500 和 Sysmex UN 系列全自动尿液分析系统与人工显微镜粒子计数的分析性能。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Jun 15;28(2):020712. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.020712.
4
Evaluation of an automated urinalysis system for testing urine chemistry, microscopy and culture.用于尿液化学、显微镜检查和培养检测的自动化尿液分析系统评估。
Pathology. 2002 Apr;34(2):170-7. doi: 10.1080/003130201201117990.
5
Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.尿沉渣检查:自动尿液分析系统与手工显微镜检查的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Sep;384(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 May 26.
6
A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis.自动尿液分析仪 cobas 6500、UN 3000 - 111b 和 iRICELL 3000 与手工显微镜尿液分析的比较。
Pract Lab Med. 2021 Jan 18;24:e00203. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00203. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment.比较五种自动化尿沉渣分析仪与手工显微镜检查对尿沉渣准确识别的效果。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Oct 25;57(11):1744-1753. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0211.
8
Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.临床实验室自动化尿液分析:自动显微镜检查、流式细胞术、两种试纸分析仪与尿液沉渣手工显微镜检查之间的比较
J Clin Lab Anal. 2008;22(4):262-70. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20257.
9
The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.自动尿液分析仪与手工显微镜检查用于尿液分析的比较:自动尿液分析仪与手工尿液分析
Pract Lab Med. 2016 Mar 11;5:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.03.002. eCollection 2016 Aug 1.
10
UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.UriSed 3和UX - 2000自动尿沉渣分析仪与手工显微镜检查法的比较性能分析
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Feb;32(2). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22249. Epub 2017 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of the Distribution of Urine Color and Its Relationship With Urine Dry Chemical Parameters Among College Students in Beijing, China - A Cross-Sectional Study.中国北京大学生尿液颜色分布及其与尿液干化学参数关系的分析——一项横断面研究
Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 4;8:719260. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.719260. eCollection 2021.
2
BA-plotteR - A web tool for generating Bland-Altman plots and constructing limits of agreement.BA-plotteR - 一个用于生成 Bland-Altman 图和构建一致性界限的网络工具。
Res Vet Sci. 2021 Jul;137:281-286. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis.
自动尿液分析仪 cobas 6500、UN 3000 - 111b 和 iRICELL 3000 与手工显微镜尿液分析的比较。
Pract Lab Med. 2021 Jan 18;24:e00203. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00203. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Semiquantitative, fully automated urine test strip analysis.半定量、全自动尿试纸条分析。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Jun;33(5):e22870. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22870. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
5
Evaluation of the analytical performances of Cobas 6500 and Sysmex UN series automated urinalysis systems with manual microscopic particle counting.评价 Cobas 6500 和 Sysmex UN 系列全自动尿液分析系统与人工显微镜粒子计数的分析性能。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Jun 15;28(2):020712. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.020712.
6
Agreement Analysis: What He Said, She Said Versus You Said.一致性分析:他说、她说与你说的。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):2123-2128. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002924.
7
The efficient workflow to decrease the manual microscopic examination of urine sediment using on-screen review of images.通过图像的屏幕审查来减少尿液沉渣手工显微镜检查的高效工作流程。
Clin Biochem. 2018 Jun;56:70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.自动尿液分析仪与手工显微镜检查用于尿液分析的比较:自动尿液分析仪与手工尿液分析
Pract Lab Med. 2016 Mar 11;5:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.03.002. eCollection 2016 Aug 1.
9
Performance evaluation of the new fully automated urine particle analyser UF-5000 compared to the reference method of the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber.新全自动尿液粒子分析仪 UF-5000 与 Fuchs-Rosenthal 室参考方法的性能评估比较。
Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Sep;472:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.07.028. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
10
Urinalysis: The Automated Versus Manual Techniques; Is It Time To Change?尿液分析:自动化技术与手工技术;是时候做出改变了吗?
Clin Lab. 2016;62(1-2):49-56. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2015.150520.