• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Iris iQ200全自动尿液显微镜分析仪的分析性能

Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.

作者信息

Linko Solveig, Kouri Timo T, Toivonen Eila, Ranta Paivi H, Chapoulaud Eric, Lalla Martti

机构信息

Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki University Central Hospital, HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2006 Oct;372(1-2):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.03.015. Epub 2006 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2006.03.015
PMID:16696963
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the Iris iQ200 Automated Urine Microscopy Analyzer to find out if the instrument performed better than traditional visual bright field microscopy in detecting basic urine particles, as assessed against reference phase contrast microscopy.

METHODS

The HUSLAB quality system was followed in planning and completing the evaluation process. The iQ200 instrument results from 167 mid-stream, uncentrifuged urine specimens were compared to those obtained with phase contrast reference microscopy, and to those with routine bright field microscopy. Linearity, carry-over and precision were tested according to well-established protocols.

RESULTS

The iQ200 counted erythrocytes (RBC) at r=0.894 (R(2)=0.799) with Automated Particle Recognition (APR) software alone and at r=0.948 (R(2)=0.898) after re-classification. The performance for leukocytes (WBC) was r=0.885 with APR and r=0.978 after re-classification. The correlations of counting after user re-classification were r=0.927 for squamous epithelial cells (SQEP), r=0.856 for casts, and r=0.706 for non-squamous epithelial cells. The iQ200 showed good linearity and precision and no carry-over was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The Iris iQ200 was capable to count reliably RBC, WBC, and SQEP cells and to identify a fraction of bacteria and renal elements. Counting results equalled or exceeded that of routine bright field microscopy or earlier flow cytometric technology. The instrument eliminates manual sample preparation but requires a well-trained technologist for re-grouping of findings.

摘要

背景

我们对Iris iQ200全自动尿液显微镜分析仪进行了评估,以确定该仪器在检测基本尿液颗粒方面是否比传统的视觉明场显微镜表现更好,并以参考相差显微镜进行评估。

方法

在规划和完成评估过程时遵循了HUSLAB质量体系。将167份中段未离心尿液标本的iQ200仪器结果与相差参考显微镜以及常规明场显微镜获得的结果进行比较。根据既定方案测试线性、残留和精密度。

结果

仅使用自动颗粒识别(APR)软件时,iQ200对红细胞(RBC)计数的相关系数r = 0.894(R² = 0.799),重新分类后为r = 0.948(R² = 0.898)。对白细胞(WBC)计数的性能,APR时r = 0.885,重新分类后为r = 0.978。用户重新分类后计数的相关性,鳞状上皮细胞(SQEP)为r = 0.927,管型为r = 0.856,非鳞状上皮细胞为r = 0.706。iQ200显示出良好的线性和精密度,未检测到残留。

结论

Iris iQ200能够可靠地计数红细胞、白细胞和鳞状上皮细胞,并识别一部分细菌和肾脏成分。计数结果等于或超过常规明场显微镜或早期流式细胞术技术。该仪器无需手动样本制备,但需要训练有素的技术人员对结果进行重新分组。

相似文献

1
Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.Iris iQ200全自动尿液显微镜分析仪的分析性能
Clin Chim Acta. 2006 Oct;372(1-2):54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.03.015. Epub 2006 May 11.
2
Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers.iQ200全自动尿液显微镜分析仪的分析性能及与使用Fuchs-Rosenthal细胞计数板的手工计数法的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Feb;123(2):290-6.
3
Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.尿沉渣检查:手工法与iQ200全自动尿沉渣分析仪的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2005 Aug;358(1-2):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2005.02.021.
4
Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX - a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser.尿液沉渣分析:sediMAX-一种新型自动化显微镜成像尿液沉渣分析仪的分析和诊断性能。
Clin Chim Acta. 2010 Feb;411(3-4):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.10.018. Epub 2009 Oct 25.
5
Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.尿沉渣检查:自动尿液分析系统与手工显微镜检查的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Sep;384(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 May 26.
6
Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis.LabUMat-with-UriSed全自动尿沉渣分析仪与iQ200全自动尿沉渣分析仪与手工尿液分析的比较。
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009 Jun;53(Pt 2):139-44. doi: 10.1042/BA20080188.
7
A multicenter evaluation of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer body fluids module and comparison with hemacytometer cell counts.Iris iQ200自动尿液显微镜分析仪体液模块的多中心评估及与血细胞计数器细胞计数的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Mar;129(3):445-50. doi: 10.1309/WR1C5WNT6UFXNC6J.
8
[Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer].[iQ200全自动尿液显微镜分析仪的评估]
Korean J Lab Med. 2008 Aug;28(4):267-73. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2008.28.4.267.
9
Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.自动化尿液分析:初步经验以及Iris iQ200尿液显微镜检查系统、Sysmex UF-100流式细胞仪与手工显微镜颗粒计数之间的比较
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(9):1251-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.503.
10
Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer and comparative study with JCCLS reference method.Sysmex UF-100全自动尿液分析仪的评估及与JCCLS参考方法的对比研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Jun;85 Suppl 1:S246-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Concordance of Results: A Comparative Study of the Manual and Automated Urinalysis Methods.评估结果一致性:手动和自动尿液分析方法的比较研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2024 Apr 20;2024:6963423. doi: 10.1155/2024/6963423. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of IDEXX SediVue Dx urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy for detection of casts in canine urine.IDEXX SediVue Dx 尿液沉渣分析仪与手工显微镜检查在犬尿液中检测管型的比较。
J Vet Intern Med. 2021 May;35(3):1439-1447. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16090. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
Prediction of urine culture results by automated urinalysis with digital flow morphology analysis.
利用数字化流式形态分析的自动尿液分析预测尿液培养结果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 16;11(1):6033. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85404-1.
4
Assessment of Interobserver Reliability of Nephrologist Examination of Urine Sediment.评估肾病学家对尿液沉淀物检查的观察者间可靠性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2013959. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13959.
5
Clinical usefulness of iQ200/iChem Velocity workstation for screening of urine culture.iQ200/iChem Velocity 工作站在尿液培养物筛选中的临床应用价值。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4141-x.
6
Comparison of the performance of the IDEXX SediVue Dx® with manual microscopy for the detection of cells and 2 crystal types in canine and feline urine.IDEXX SediVue Dx®与手工显微镜检查在检测犬猫尿液中细胞和两种晶体类型方面的性能比较。
J Vet Intern Med. 2019 Jan;33(1):167-177. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15341. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Progress in Automated Urinalysis.尿液分析自动化的进展。
Ann Lab Med. 2019 Jan;39(1):15-22. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.1.15.
8
The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.自动尿液分析仪与手工显微镜检查用于尿液分析的比较:自动尿液分析仪与手工尿液分析
Pract Lab Med. 2016 Mar 11;5:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.03.002. eCollection 2016 Aug 1.
9
High False Positives and False Negatives in Yeast Parameter in an Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer.自动尿沉渣分析仪中酵母参数的高假阳性和假阴性
J Med Biochem. 2015 Jul;34(3):332-337. doi: 10.2478/jomb-2014-0052. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Review of Telemicrobiology.远程微生物学综述
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Apr;140(4):362-70. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0116-RA. Epub 2015 Aug 28.