Suppr超能文献

两种正畸粘合剂与自锁托槽和传统托槽之间的剪切粘结强度比较。

Shear bond strength comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and self-ligating and conventional brackets.

作者信息

Northrup Rodney G, Berzins David W, Bradley Thomas Gerard, Schuckit William

机构信息

Marquette University, Milwaukee,WI 53201-1881, USA.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2007 Jul;77(4):701-6. doi: 10.2319/022406-79.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of two adhesives using two types of brackets: a conventional and a self-ligating bracket system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty extracted human premolars were collected. The premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth. All three groups were direct bonded. Groups 1 and 2 used light-cured adhesive and primer (Transbond XT) with a conventional (Orthos) and a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2), respectively. Group 3 used a light-cured primer (Orthosolo) and a light-cured adhesive (Blūgloo) with a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 40 +/- 2 hours, after which they were debonded and inspected for Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring.

RESULTS

The mean shear bond strength was 15.2 MPa for group 1, 23.2 MPa for group 2, and 24.8 MPa for group 3. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test showed significant differences in bond strength (P < .001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 but no significant difference (P > .05) between groups 2 and 3. A Weibull analysis demonstrated that all three groups provided sufficient bond strength with over 90% survival rate at normal masticatory and orthodontic force levels. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference (P > .05) in ARI scores among all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All three groups demonstrated clinically acceptable bond strength. The Damon 2 self-ligating bracket exhibited satisfactory in vitro bond strength with both adhesive systems used.

摘要

目的

使用两种类型的托槽(传统托槽和自锁托槽系统)评估并比较两种黏合剂的剪切黏结强度。

材料与方法

收集60颗拔除的人类前磨牙。将这些前磨牙随机分为三组,每组20颗牙。所有三组均采用直接黏结。第1组和第2组分别使用光固化黏合剂和底漆(Transbond XT)与传统托槽(Orthos)和自锁托槽(Damon 2)。第3组使用光固化底漆(Orthosolo)和光固化黏合剂(Blūgloo)与自锁托槽(Damon 2)。将标本在37摄氏度的蒸馏水中储存40±2小时,之后进行脱黏,并检查黏合剂残留指数(ARI)评分。

结果

第1组的平均剪切黏结强度为15.2兆帕,第2组为23.2兆帕,第3组为24.8兆帕。单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验显示,第1组与第2组和第3组之间的黏结强度存在显著差异(P < .001),但第2组和第3组之间无显著差异(P > .05)。威布尔分析表明,在正常咀嚼和正畸力水平下,所有三组均提供了足够的黏结强度,存活率超过90%。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示,所有三组的ARI评分无显著差异(P > .05)。

结论

所有三组均表现出临床上可接受的黏结强度。Damon 2自锁托槽与所使用的两种黏合系统均表现出令人满意的体外黏结强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验