• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种正畸粘合剂与自锁托槽和传统托槽之间的剪切粘结强度比较。

Shear bond strength comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and self-ligating and conventional brackets.

作者信息

Northrup Rodney G, Berzins David W, Bradley Thomas Gerard, Schuckit William

机构信息

Marquette University, Milwaukee,WI 53201-1881, USA.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2007 Jul;77(4):701-6. doi: 10.2319/022406-79.

DOI:10.2319/022406-79
PMID:17605477
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of two adhesives using two types of brackets: a conventional and a self-ligating bracket system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty extracted human premolars were collected. The premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth. All three groups were direct bonded. Groups 1 and 2 used light-cured adhesive and primer (Transbond XT) with a conventional (Orthos) and a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2), respectively. Group 3 used a light-cured primer (Orthosolo) and a light-cured adhesive (Blūgloo) with a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 40 +/- 2 hours, after which they were debonded and inspected for Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring.

RESULTS

The mean shear bond strength was 15.2 MPa for group 1, 23.2 MPa for group 2, and 24.8 MPa for group 3. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test showed significant differences in bond strength (P < .001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 but no significant difference (P > .05) between groups 2 and 3. A Weibull analysis demonstrated that all three groups provided sufficient bond strength with over 90% survival rate at normal masticatory and orthodontic force levels. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference (P > .05) in ARI scores among all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All three groups demonstrated clinically acceptable bond strength. The Damon 2 self-ligating bracket exhibited satisfactory in vitro bond strength with both adhesive systems used.

摘要

目的

使用两种类型的托槽(传统托槽和自锁托槽系统)评估并比较两种黏合剂的剪切黏结强度。

材料与方法

收集60颗拔除的人类前磨牙。将这些前磨牙随机分为三组,每组20颗牙。所有三组均采用直接黏结。第1组和第2组分别使用光固化黏合剂和底漆(Transbond XT)与传统托槽(Orthos)和自锁托槽(Damon 2)。第3组使用光固化底漆(Orthosolo)和光固化黏合剂(Blūgloo)与自锁托槽(Damon 2)。将标本在37摄氏度的蒸馏水中储存40±2小时,之后进行脱黏,并检查黏合剂残留指数(ARI)评分。

结果

第1组的平均剪切黏结强度为15.2兆帕,第2组为23.2兆帕,第3组为24.8兆帕。单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验显示,第1组与第2组和第3组之间的黏结强度存在显著差异(P < .001),但第2组和第3组之间无显著差异(P > .05)。威布尔分析表明,在正常咀嚼和正畸力水平下,所有三组均提供了足够的黏结强度,存活率超过90%。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示,所有三组的ARI评分无显著差异(P > .05)。

结论

所有三组均表现出临床上可接受的黏结强度。Damon 2自锁托槽与所使用的两种黏合系统均表现出令人满意的体外黏结强度。

相似文献

1
Shear bond strength comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and self-ligating and conventional brackets.两种正畸粘合剂与自锁托槽和传统托槽之间的剪切粘结强度比较。
Angle Orthod. 2007 Jul;77(4):701-6. doi: 10.2319/022406-79.
2
Comparison of bond strength between orthodontic brackets bonded with halogen and plasma arc curing lights: an in-vitro and in-vivo study.用卤素灯和等离子弧固化灯粘结正畸托槽的粘结强度比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Feb;129(2):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.043.
3
Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.新型陶瓷托槽的粘结强度与脱粘特性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):761-5; quiz 802. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.041.
4
A comparison of shear bond strength of immediate and delayed bonding of brackets to FRC bars using various orthodontic adhesives.使用各种正畸粘合剂对托槽与纤维增强复合材料(FRC)棒材进行即刻粘结和延迟粘结时的剪切粘结强度比较。
Aust Orthod J. 2011 May;27(1):4-9.
5
A comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin cement and two orthodontic resin adhesive systems.一种树脂水门汀与两种正畸树脂粘接系统的剪切粘接强度比较。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):109-13. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0109:ACOTSB>2.0.CO;2.
6
Effect of self-etching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.自酸蚀底漆和粘结剂配方对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 May;127(5):573-9; quiz 625-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.027.
7
The effect of variation in mesh-base design on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.网基设计变化对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):400-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0400:TEOVIM>2.0.CO;2.
8
Bond strength of an amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic adhesive.含无定形磷酸钙的正畸粘合剂的粘结强度
Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):339-44. doi: 10.2319/020807-60.
9
Shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base.
Angle Orthod. 2002 Apr;72(2):141-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0141:SBSOPB>2.0.CO;2.
10
Orthodontic bracket shear bond strengths produced by two high-power light-emitting diode modes and halogen light.两种高功率发光二极管模式和卤素光产生的正畸托槽剪切粘结强度。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):854-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[854:OBSBSP]2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the biological, physical, mechanical and chemical properties of orthodontic primer modified by nano-chitosan loaded with bioactive materials.负载生物活性材料的纳米壳聚糖修饰正畸底漆的生物学、物理、机械和化学性能评估。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 May-Jun;15(3):500-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial.使用单组分与双组分正畸粘合剂时间接粘结托槽的存活率:一项为期12个月的半口临床试验。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Sep;35(6):657-662. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems' Bond Strength: Conventional and Self-Ligating.
两种托槽系统粘结强度的比较评估:传统型和自结扎型。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Oct 21;10(10):196. doi: 10.3390/dj10100196.
4
Mean Shearing Stroke Frequency of Orthodontic Brackets under Cycling Loading: An In Vitro Study.循环加载下正畸托槽的平均剪切冲程频率:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 25;13(19):4280. doi: 10.3390/ma13194280.
5
Whitening Dentifrices Effect on Enamel with Orthodontic Braces after Simulated Brushing.模拟刷牙后美白牙膏对佩戴正畸矫治器的牙釉质的影响
Eur J Dent. 2020 Feb;14(1):13-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3403474. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
6
Does the Seating Force Affect the Shear Bond Strength of Brackets? An InVitro Study.就位力是否会影响托槽的剪切粘结强度?一项体外研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2016 Mar;29(1):6-9. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00009R1. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
7
Evaluation of an alternative technique to optimize direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to temporary crowns.评估一种优化正畸托槽与临时冠直接粘结的替代技术。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):57-62. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.4.057-062.oar.
8
Shear bond strength of orthodontic color-change adhesives with different light-curing times.不同光固化时间的正畸变色黏合剂的剪切粘结强度
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 May-Jun;12(3):265-70.
9
Effects of two soft drinks on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of orthodontic metal brackets.两种软饮料对正畸金属托槽剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的影响。
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jul;11(4):389-97. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
10
The effect of an acidic food-simulating environment on the shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets with different base designs.酸性食物模拟环境对不同基底设计的自锁托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Int J Dent. 2014;2014:689536. doi: 10.1155/2014/689536. Epub 2014 Sep 23.