Suppr超能文献

通过同位素稀释法在具有可变变形性的红细胞群体中准确测定平均细胞体积。

Accurate determination of mean cell volume by isotope dilution in erythrocyte populations with variable deformability.

作者信息

Marvel J S, Sutera S P, Krogstad D J, Zarkowsky H S, Williamson J R

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130.

出版信息

Blood Cells. 1991;17(3):497-512; discussion 513-5.

PMID:1760558
Abstract

Variations in erythrocyte deformability and morphology lead to artifacts in electronic determinations of mean cellular volume (MCV) by the aperture-impedance method. The micropipette-aspiration technique loses accuracy when applied to severely aberrant cells such as dense sickle cells. A new light-scattering technique requires that the cells be capable of undergoing isovolumetric sphering. In contrast, the isotope-dilution (ID) method measures absolute mean volume and is free of artifacts associated with abnormal deformability or morphology. It does not depend on any algorithms or correction factors and does not subject the cells to any stringent processing, not even centrifugation. The ID method can be used to determine the mean volume of red cells in hypo- or hypertonic media or in the presence of pharmacologic agents. It requires no more than a 1-ml aliquot of suspended cells at a hematocrit of at least 30%. The cells can be readily recovered, washed, and reused. Using EDTA labeled with 57Co as an extracellular space marker we have used ID to determine the MCV of fractionated normal human red blood cells (RBC), unfractionated RBC containing SS hemoglobin, and RBC from four other mammalian species. In the case of human RBC obtained from eight normal donors, we obtained mean MCV values (+/- SD) of 83.6 +/- 3.0, 87.5 +/- 3.9, and 76.5 +/- 5.3 fl for unfractionated and top and bottom 10% density fractions, respectively. The value 83.6 is significantly lower than the generally accepted range of 89-91 indicated by electronic analyzers calibrated against spun microhematocrits. The discrepancy of about 7% can account for the difference between mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) data determined by a calibrated Coulter Counter and corresponding data obtained with paired samples using a cyanmethemoglobin procedure specified in NCCLS Standard H15-A and corrected for trapped plasma.

摘要

红细胞可变形性和形态的变化会导致通过孔径阻抗法进行电子测定平均细胞体积(MCV)时出现假象。微量移液管抽吸技术应用于严重异常的细胞(如致密镰状细胞)时会失去准确性。一种新的光散射技术要求细胞能够进行等容球化。相比之下,同位素稀释(ID)法测量的是绝对平均体积,且不存在与异常可变形性或形态相关的假象。它不依赖于任何算法或校正因子,也不会对细胞进行任何严格处理,甚至不需要离心。ID法可用于测定低渗或高渗介质中或存在药理剂时红细胞的平均体积。它只需要1毫升血细胞比容至少为30%的悬浮细胞等分试样。细胞可以很容易地回收、洗涤并重复使用。我们使用57Co标记的EDTA作为细胞外空间标记物,通过ID法测定了正常人分馏红细胞(RBC)、含SS血红蛋白的未分馏RBC以及其他四种哺乳动物RBC的MCV。对于从八名正常供体获得的人RBC,未分馏的以及顶部和底部10%密度级分的平均MCV值(±标准差)分别为83.6±3.0、87.5±3.9和76.5±5.3飞升。83.6这个值明显低于根据旋转微量血细胞比容校准的电子分析仪所显示的普遍接受范围89 - 91。约7%的差异可以解释校准的库尔特计数器测定的平均细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)数据与使用NCCLS标准H15 - A中规定的氰化高铁血红蛋白程序并针对截留血浆进行校正的配对样本获得的相应数据之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验