Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的疗效:对基层医疗医生的启示

Efficacy of duloxetine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: implications for primary care physicians.

作者信息

Koponen Hannu, Allgulander Christer, Erickson Janelle, Dunayevich Eduardo, Pritchett Yili, Detke Michael J, Ball Susan G, Russell James M

机构信息

University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9(2):100-7. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v09n0203.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine, a dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, for the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).

METHOD

Patients were ≥ 18 years old and recruited from 5 European countries, the United States, and South Africa. The study had a 9-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. A total of 513 patients (mean age = 43.8 years; 67.8% female) with a DSM-IV-defined GAD diagnosis received treatment with duloxetine 60 mg/day (N = 168), duloxetine 120 mg/day (N = 170), or placebo (N = 175). The primary efficacy measure was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total score. Secondary measures included the Sheehan Disability Scale, HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety factor scores, and HAM-A response, remission, and sustained improvement rates. The study was conducted from July 2004 to September 2005.

RESULTS

Both groups of duloxetine-treated patients demonstrated significantly greater improvements in anxiety symptom severity compared with placebo-treated patients as measured by HAM-A total score and HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety factor scores (p values ranged from ≤ .01 to ≤ .001). Duloxetine-treated patients had greater functional improvements in Sheehan Disability Scale global and specific domain scores (p ≤ .001) than placebo-treated patients. Both duloxetine doses also resulted in significantly greater HAM-A response, remission, and sustained improvement rates compared with placebo (p values ranged from ≤ .01 to ≤ .001). The rate of study discontinuation due to adverse events was 11.3% for duloxetine 60 mg and 15.3% for duloxetine 120 mg versus 2.3% for placebo (p ≤ .001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that duloxetine 60 mg/day and 120 mg/day were efficacious and well tolerated and thus may provide primary care physicians with a useful pharmacologic intervention for GAD.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00122824.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素双重再摄取抑制剂度洛西汀治疗广泛性焦虑症(GAD)患者的疗效和耐受性。

方法

患者年龄≥18岁,来自5个欧洲国家、美国和南非。本研究采用9周、多中心、随机、双盲、固定剂量、安慰剂对照、平行组设计。共有513例诊断为DSM-IV定义的广泛性焦虑症的患者接受了治疗,其中每天服用60mg度洛西汀的患者有168例,每天服用120mg度洛西汀的患者有170例,服用安慰剂的患者有175例(平均年龄=43.8岁;67.8%为女性)。主要疗效指标为汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)总分。次要指标包括希恩残疾量表、HAM-A精神和躯体焦虑因子评分以及HAM-A反应、缓解和持续改善率。本研究于2004年7月至2005年9月进行。

结果

与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,两组接受度洛西汀治疗的患者在焦虑症状严重程度方面均有显著更大的改善,这通过HAM-A总分以及HAM-A精神和躯体焦虑因子评分来衡量(p值范围从≤0.01至≤0.001)。与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受度洛西汀治疗的患者在希恩残疾量表总体和特定领域评分方面有更大的功能改善(p≤0.001)。与安慰剂相比,两种度洛西汀剂量在HAM-A反应、缓解和持续改善率方面也均有显著更高的数值(p值范围从≤0.01至≤0.001)。因不良事件导致的研究停药率,60mg度洛西汀组为11.3%,120mg度洛西汀组为15.3%,而安慰剂组为2.3%(p≤0.001)。

结论

本研究结果表明,每天服用60mg和120mg度洛西汀有效且耐受性良好,因此可能为基层医疗医生治疗广泛性焦虑症提供一种有用的药物干预措施。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT00122824。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Antidepressants versus placebo for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD).抗抑郁药与安慰剂治疗广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 30;1(1):CD012942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012942.pub2.

本文引用的文献

9
The Rater Applied Performance Scale: development and reliability.评估者应用表现量表:开发与信度
Psychiatry Res. 2004 Jun 30;127(1-2):147-55. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.03.001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验