Suppr超能文献

恐怖主义、创伤与大规模伤亡分诊:我们该如何解决最新的身心问题?

Terrorism, trauma, and mass casualty triage: how might we solve the latest mind-body problem?

作者信息

Engel Charles C, Locke Steven, Reissman Dori B, DeMartino Robert, Kutz Ilan, McDonald Michael, Barsky Arthur J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814-4799, USA.

出版信息

Biosecur Bioterror. 2007 Jun;5(2):155-63. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2007.0004.

Abstract

The global war on terrorism has led to increased concern about the ability of the U.S. healthcare system to respond to casualties from a chemical, biological, or radiological agent attack. Relatively little attention, however, has focused on the potential, in the immediate aftermath of such an attack, for large numbers of casualties presenting to triage points with acute health anxiety and idiopathic physical symptoms. This sort of "mass idiopathic illness" is not a certain outcome of chemical, biological, or radiological attack. However, in the event that this phenomenon occurs, it could result in surges in demand for medical evaluations that may disrupt triage systems and endanger lives. Conversely, if continuous primary care is not available for such patients after initial triage, many may suffer with unrecognized physical and emotional injuries and illness. This report is the result of an expert planning initiative seeking to facilitate triage protocols that will address the possibility of mass idiopathic illness and bolster healthcare system surge capacity. The report reviews key triage assumptions and gaps in knowledge and offers a four-stage triage model for further discussion and research. Optimal triage approaches offer flexibility and should be based on empirical studies, critical incident modeling, lessons from simulation exercises, and case studies. In addition to staging, the proposed triage and longitudinal care model relies on early recognition of symptoms, development of a registry, and use of non-physician care management to facilitate later longitudinal followup and collaboration between primary care and psychiatry for the significant minority of patients who develop persistent idiopathic symptoms associated with reduced functional status.

摘要

全球反恐战争使人们更加关注美国医疗系统应对化学、生物或放射性制剂袭击造成的伤亡的能力。然而,相对而言,很少有人关注在这类袭击刚结束后,大量伤员出现在分诊点,伴有急性健康焦虑和特发性身体症状的可能性。这种“群体性特发性疾病”并非化学、生物或放射性袭击的必然结果。然而,如果这种现象发生,可能会导致医疗评估需求激增,从而扰乱分诊系统并危及生命。相反,如果在初始分诊后此类患者无法获得持续的初级护理,许多人可能会遭受未被识别的身体和情感伤害及疾病。本报告是一项专家规划倡议的成果,该倡议旨在推动分诊方案,以应对群体性特发性疾病的可能性并增强医疗系统的应急能力。该报告回顾了关键的分诊假设和知识空白,并提供了一个四阶段分诊模型以供进一步讨论和研究。最佳的分诊方法应具有灵活性,且应基于实证研究、关键事件建模、模拟演练的经验教训以及案例研究。除了分阶段进行,提议的分诊和长期护理模型还依赖于症状的早期识别、登记册的建立,以及利用非医生护理管理来促进后续的长期随访,并促进初级护理和精神病学之间的协作,以照顾少数出现与功能状态下降相关的持续性特发性症状的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验