Ono Rei, Hirata Soichiro, Yamada Minoru, Nishiyama Takayuki, Kurosaka Masahiro, Tamura Yumi
Faculty of Health Sciences, Kobe University School of Medicine, Tomogaoka, Suma-Ku, Kobe, Japan.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Jul 5;8:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-61.
Although physical activity maintenance is important for OA management, it is not clear whether people with OA are more inactive or not. One possible reason is no simple monitoring tool to assess physical activity at the clinic. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (BQ) in adult women with hip disorders.
Sixty-four patients with unilateral or bilateral hip disorders were recruited from an outpatients clinic at a university hospital in Japan. BQ includes a total of 16 questions classified into three domains: work, sports, and non-sports leisure activity. For test-retest reliability, one BQ was administrated face-to-face, and a second was mailed to participants two weeks later. Test-retest reliability of BQ was assessed using intra-class correlation (ICC) and Bland and Altman method. To determine criterion validity, the correlation between BQ measurements and pedometer-measured step counts was assessed. Correlations between BQ measurements and step counts were assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rho).
Analyses were restricted to the 61 patients (53.3 +/- 11.3 years old) who wore the pedometer continuously for 5 days or more. Twenty eight patients had unilateral hip osteoarthritis, 17 patients had unilateral total hip arthroplasty, and 16 patients had hip osteoarthritis and total hip arthroplasty. The mean step count was 6,309 +/- 2,392 steps/day. In analysis for reliability, the value of ICC was 0.84 for work, 0.83 for sports, 0.78 for non-sports leisure activity, and 0.87 total. Bland and Altman analysis showed the step count and BQ total did not differ significantly from 0 with most falling between 0 +/- 1.96 SD. In analysis for validity, there was a significant but low to moderate correlation between step counts and 3 BQ subscales (rho, 0.30-0.49) and a higher correlation between step counts and total score (rho, 0.49).
BQ is a useful monitoring tool for assessing multiple domains of physical activity with acceptable reliability and validity in adult women with hip disorders.
尽管保持身体活动对骨关节炎(OA)的管理很重要,但尚不清楚OA患者是否更缺乏运动。一个可能的原因是在诊所没有简单的监测工具来评估身体活动。本研究的目的是确定贝克身体活动问卷(BQ)在患有髋部疾病的成年女性中的信度和效度。
从日本一家大学医院的门诊招募了64名单侧或双侧髋部疾病患者。BQ共有16个问题,分为三个领域:工作、运动和非运动休闲活动。为了进行重测信度分析,当面发放一份BQ,两周后再给参与者邮寄一份。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和布兰德-奥特曼方法评估BQ的重测信度。为了确定效标效度,评估BQ测量值与计步器测量的步数之间的相关性。使用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(rho)评估BQ测量值与步数之间的相关性。
分析仅限于61名(年龄53.3±11.3岁)连续佩戴计步器5天或更长时间的患者。28名患者患有单侧髋骨关节炎,17名患者接受了单侧全髋关节置换术,16名患者患有髋骨关节炎并接受了全髋关节置换术。平均步数为6309±2392步/天。在信度分析中,工作领域的ICC值为0.84,运动领域为0.83,非运动休闲活动领域为0.78,总分的ICC值为0.87。布兰德-奥特曼分析表明,步数与BQ总分与0没有显著差异,大多数落在0±1.96标准差之间。在效度分析中,步数与3个BQ分量表之间存在显著但低到中等的相关性(rho,0.30 - 0.49),步数与总分之间的相关性更高(rho,0.49)。
BQ是一种有用的监测工具,可用于评估患有髋部疾病的成年女性身体活动的多个领域,具有可接受的信度和效度。