Hooker Andrew C, Staatz Christine E, Karlsson Mats O
Division of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy, Dept. of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 591, 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pharm Res. 2007 Dec;24(12):2187-97. doi: 10.1007/s11095-007-9361-x. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
Population model analyses have shifted from using the first order (FO) to the first-order with conditional estimation (FOCE) approximation to the true model. However, the weighted residuals (WRES), a common diagnostic tool used to test for model misspecification, are calculated using the FO approximation. Utilizing WRES with the FOCE method may lead to misguided model development/evaluation. We present a new diagnostic tool, the conditional weighted residuals (CWRES), which are calculated based on the FOCE approximation.
CWRES are calculated as the FOCE approximated difference between an individual's data and the model prediction of that data divided by the root of the covariance of the data given the model.
Using real and simulated data the CWRES distributions behave as theoretically expected under the correct model. In contrast, in certain circumstances, the WRES have distributions that greatly deviate from the expected, falsely indicating model misspecification. CWRES/WRES comparisons can also indicate if the FOCE estimation method will improve the results of an FO model fit to data.
Utilization of CWRES could improve model development and evaluation and give a more accurate picture of if and when a model is misspecified when using the FO or FOCE methods.
群体模型分析已从使用一阶(FO)近似转变为使用带条件估计的一阶(FOCE)近似来逼近真实模型。然而,用于检验模型设定错误的常用诊断工具加权残差(WRES)是使用FO近似计算的。将WRES与FOCE方法一起使用可能会导致模型开发/评估出现误导。我们提出了一种新的诊断工具,即条件加权残差(CWRES),它是基于FOCE近似计算的。
CWRES计算为个体数据与该数据的模型预测之间的FOCE近似差值,再除以给定模型下数据协方差的平方根。
使用真实数据和模拟数据时,在正确模型下,CWRES分布符合理论预期。相比之下,在某些情况下,WRES的分布与预期有很大偏差,错误地表明模型设定错误。CWRES/WRES比较还可以表明FOCE估计方法是否会改善拟合数据的FO模型的结果。
使用CWRES可以改进模型开发和评估,并在使用FO或FOCE方法时更准确地了解模型是否以及何时设定错误。