Schouwenburg Stef, Keij Fleur M, Tramper-Stranders Gerdien A, Kornelisse René F, Reiss Irwin K M, De Cock Pieter A J G, Dhont Evelyn, Watt Kevin M, Muller Anouk E, Flint Robert B, Koch Birgit C P, Allegaert Karel, Preijers Tim
Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rotterdam Clinical Pharmacometrics Group, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jan;117(1):193-202. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3423. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Data published on the oral clavulanic acid pharmacokinetics in the pediatric population is lacking. This research aimed to describe clavulanic acid disposition following oral and intravenous administration and to provide insights into clavulanic acid exposure based on threshold concentrations for (pre-)term neonates and infants. This pooled population pharmacokinetic study combined four datasets for analysis in NONMEM v7.4.3. Clavulanic acid exposure was simulated using the percentage of time above the threshold concentrations (%fT > C). Multiple dosage regimens and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid dosage ratios were evaluated. The cohort consisted of 89 (42 oral, 47 intravenous) subjects (403 samples) with a median (range) postnatal age 54.5 days (0-365), gestational age 37.4 weeks (23.0-41.7), and current bodyweight 3.9 kg (0.6-9.0). A one-compartment model with first-order absorption best described clavulanic acid pharmacokinetics with postnatal age as a covariate on the inter-individual variability of clearance. Oral bioavailability was 24.4% in neonates up to 10 days of age. An oral dosing regimen 90 mg/kg/day amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (4:1 ratio) resulted in 40.2% of simulated patients achieving 100% fT > C. An amoxicillin/clavulanic acid ratio of 4:1 is preferred for neonatal oral regimens due to the higher exposure along the entire %fT > C range (0-100%) as ratios higher than 4:1 might result in inadequate exposure. Our results highlight substantial exposure differences (%fT > C) when using threshold concentrations of 1 mg/L vs. 2 mg/L. This first population pharmacokinetic model for clavulanic acid in neonates may serve as a foundational step for future research, once more precise clavulanic acid targets become available.
关于儿科人群口服克拉维酸药代动力学的数据尚缺。本研究旨在描述口服和静脉给药后克拉维酸的处置情况,并根据(早产)新生儿和婴儿的阈值浓度深入了解克拉维酸的暴露情况。这项汇总的群体药代动力学研究合并了四个数据集,用于在NONMEM v7.4.3中进行分析。使用高于阈值浓度的时间百分比(%fT > C)模拟克拉维酸暴露情况。评估了多种给药方案和阿莫西林/克拉维酸剂量比。该队列由89名(42名口服,47名静脉注射)受试者(403个样本)组成,出生后年龄中位数(范围)为54.5天(0 - 365天),胎龄37.4周(23.0 - 41.7周),当前体重3.9千克(0.6 - 9.0千克)。一个具有一级吸收的单室模型能最好地描述克拉维酸的药代动力学,其中出生后年龄作为清除个体间变异性的协变量。10日龄以内的新生儿口服生物利用度为24.4%。口服给药方案90毫克/千克/天阿莫西林/克拉维酸(4:1比例)使40.2%的模拟患者达到100% fT > C。由于在整个%fT > C范围(0 - 100%)内暴露更高,而高于4:1的比例可能导致暴露不足,因此对于新生儿口服方案,阿莫西林/克拉维酸比例为4:1更为合适。我们的结果突出了使用1毫克/升与2毫克/升阈值浓度时显著的暴露差异(%fT > C)。一旦有更精确的克拉维酸靶点,这个首个新生儿克拉维酸群体药代动力学模型可能成为未来研究的基础步骤。