Swenson E Scott, Price Joanna G, Brazelton Timothy, Krause Diane S
Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8019, USA.
Stem Cells. 2007 Oct;25(10):2593-600. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0241. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
The enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter has been widely adopted for tracking cell lineage. Here, we compare three transgenic mouse strains in which GFP is considered "ubiquitously expressed," with the GFP transgene under control of the chicken beta-actin (CBA) or human ubiquitin C (UBC) promoter. We compared the expression of GFP using flow cytometry, direct tissue fluorescence, and immunostaining with multiple commercially available anti-GFP antibodies. Mice of CBA-GFP strain 1Osb have strong but variegated expression of GFP in adult liver, kidney, small intestine, and blood. Mice of CBA-GFP strain Y01 have the highest proportion of GFP-positive peripheral blood cells yet limited GFP expression in liver, intestine, and kidney. UBC-GFP mice express GFP only weakly in solid organs and variably in blood. Direct fluorescent detection of GFP in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections was the simplest approach, but it was useful only in high-expressing strains and potentially subject to artifact because of tissue autofluorescence. Immunofluorescence using either primary goat or primary rabbit antibodies was much more sensitive and allowed better discrimination of authentic signal from autofluorescence. Immunohistochemical staining was less sensitive than direct fluorescence or immunofluorescence and was subject to false-positive signal in the small intestine. In conclusion, there is considerable variability of expression within and between GFP transgenic strains. None of the tested strains gave truly ubiquitous GFP expression. A detailed analysis of GFP expression in one's tissues of interest must guide the choice of reporter mouse strain when GFP is used as a marker of cell lineage or donor origin. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
增强型绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)报告基因已被广泛用于追踪细胞谱系。在此,我们比较了三种转基因小鼠品系,其中GFP被认为是“普遍表达”的,GFP转基因受鸡β-肌动蛋白(CBA)或人泛素C(UBC)启动子的控制。我们使用流式细胞术、直接组织荧光以及用多种市售抗GFP抗体进行免疫染色来比较GFP的表达。CBA-GFP品系1Osb的小鼠在成年肝脏、肾脏、小肠和血液中具有强烈但斑驳的GFP表达。CBA-GFP品系Y01的小鼠中GFP阳性外周血细胞的比例最高,但在肝脏、肠道和肾脏中的GFP表达有限。UBC-GFP小鼠在实体器官中仅微弱表达GFP,在血液中的表达则变化不定。在福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋的组织切片中对GFP进行直接荧光检测是最简单的方法,但仅在高表达品系中有用,并且由于组织自发荧光可能会产生假象。使用山羊一抗或兔一抗的免疫荧光更为灵敏,能够更好地将真实信号与自发荧光区分开来。免疫组织化学染色不如直接荧光或免疫荧光灵敏,并且在小肠中会出现假阳性信号。总之,GFP转基因品系内部和之间的表达存在相当大的变异性。没有一个测试品系能实现真正普遍的GFP表达。当GFP用作细胞谱系或供体来源的标记时,对感兴趣组织中GFP表达的详细分析必须指导报告基因小鼠品系的选择。潜在利益冲突的披露见本文末尾。