Hui L L, Hedley A J, Nelson E A S, Malisch R, Wong T W, Cowling B J
Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, William M.W. Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Chemosphere. 2007 Oct;69(8):1287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.038. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
Chemically-activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX) bioassay and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) are used to determine dioxin levels in food and humans. Valid measures of the agreement between the two methods would improve interpretation of bioassay results. Paired breast milk samples from 250 mothers, as 11 pooled samples, were analysed by GC/MS for total WHO-TEQ (7 polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins, 10 polychlorinated dibenzofurans and 12 dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls) and as individual samples by CALUX. Mean difference between total WHO-TEQ (weighted by TEF system derived in 1997) and mean CALUX-TEQ in each pool was 1.6 pg/g fat (95% CI: 0.7, 2.4), indicating a statistically significant overestimation of CALUX-TEQ compared to WHO-TEQ, probably due to the presence of Ah-receptor agonists. CALUX estimated toxicity of 13 pg/g fat was greater than the WHO-TEQ by 0.9, 3.1 and 0.3 pg/g fat for mothers from Hong Kong, mainland China and overseas territories, respectively. When the 2005 TEF system was applied, a reduction of 14-26% in the WHO-TEQ and a larger but less disperse discrepancy between WHO-TEQ and CALUX-TEQ (3.9 pg/g fat, 95% CI: 3.5, 4.4) were observed. Our study suggested that the mothers' place of residence explained the discrepancy between CALUX-TEQ and WHO-TEQ and should be considered in inter-country comparisons for CALUX-TEQ. For regulatory purposes bioassays for detecting quantitative dioxin contents in any setting must be combined with adequate extraction, clean-up and validation with WHO-TEQs. The larger difference between the two measurements after using the new TEF system warrants further investigation.
化学激活荧光素酶基因表达(CALUX)生物测定法和气相色谱/质谱联用(GC/MS)法用于测定食品和人体中的二恶英水平。两种方法之间一致性的有效衡量标准将有助于更好地解读生物测定结果。来自250名母亲的母乳样本作为11个混合样本,通过GC/MS分析了总的世界卫生组织毒性当量(WHO-TEQ,包括7种多氯代二苯并对二恶英、10种多氯代二苯并呋喃和12种二恶英类多氯联苯),并作为单个样本通过CALUX进行分析。每个混合样本中总的WHO-TEQ(根据1997年得出的毒性当量因子系统加权)与平均CALUX-TEQ之间的平均差异为1.6皮克/克脂肪(95%置信区间:0.7,2.4),这表明与WHO-TEQ相比,CALUX-TEQ在统计学上存在显著高估,可能是由于存在芳烃受体激动剂。对于来自中国香港、中国大陆和海外地区的母亲,CALUX估计的13皮克/克脂肪的毒性分别比WHO-TEQ高0.9、3.1和0.3皮克/克脂肪。当应用2005年毒性当量因子系统时,观察到WHO-TEQ降低了14% - 26%,并且WHO-TEQ与CALUX-TEQ之间的差异更大但离散度更小(3.9皮克/克脂肪,95%置信区间:3.5,4.4)。我们的研究表明,母亲的居住地解释了CALUX-TEQ与WHO-TEQ之间的差异,在进行国家间CALUX-TEQ比较时应予以考虑。出于监管目的,在任何环境下用于检测二恶英定量含量的生物测定法都必须与充分的提取、净化以及与WHO-TEQ的验证相结合。使用新的毒性当量因子系统后两种测量方法之间的较大差异值得进一步研究。