González Ana M, Larruga José M, Abu-Amero Khaled K, Shi Yufei, Pestano José, Cabrera Vicente M
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
BMC Genomics. 2007 Jul 9;8:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-223.
The out of Africa hypothesis has gained generalized consensus. However, many specific questions remain unsettled. To know whether the two M and N macrohaplogroups that colonized Eurasia were already present in Africa before the exit is puzzling. It has been proposed that the east African clade M1 supports a single origin of haplogroup M in Africa. To test the validity of that hypothesis, the phylogeographic analysis of 13 complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences and 261 partial sequences belonging to haplogroup M1 was carried out.
The coalescence age of the African haplogroup M1 is younger than those for other M Asiatic clades. In contradiction to the hypothesis of an eastern Africa origin for modern human expansions out of Africa, the most ancestral M1 lineages have been found in Northwest Africa and in the Near East, instead of in East Africa. The M1 geographic distribution and the relative ages of its different subclades clearly correlate with those of haplogroup U6, for which an Eurasian ancestor has been demonstrated.
This study provides evidence that M1, or its ancestor, had an Asiatic origin. The earliest M1 expansion into Africa occurred in northwestern instead of eastern areas; this early spread reached the Iberian Peninsula even affecting the Basques. The majority of the M1a lineages found outside and inside Africa had a more recent eastern Africa origin. Both western and eastern M1 lineages participated in the Neolithic colonization of the Sahara. The striking parallelism between subclade ages and geographic distribution of M1 and its North African U6 counterpart strongly reinforces this scenario. Finally, a relevant fraction of M1a lineages present today in the European Continent and nearby islands possibly had a Jewish instead of the commonly proposed Arab/Berber maternal ascendance.
“走出非洲”假说已获得广泛共识。然而,许多具体问题仍未解决。要确定殖民欧亚大陆的两个M和N大 haplogroup在走出非洲之前是否已存在于非洲,这令人困惑。有人提出东非分支M1支持单倍群M在非洲的单一起源。为了检验该假说的有效性,对属于单倍群M1的13个完整线粒体DNA(mtDNA)序列和261个部分序列进行了系统发育地理学分析。
非洲单倍群M1的合并年龄比其他亚洲M分支的合并年龄年轻。与现代人类从非洲扩张起源于东非的假说相反,最原始的M1谱系是在西北非洲和近东地区发现的,而不是在东非。M1的地理分布及其不同亚分支的相对年龄与单倍群U6的地理分布和相对年龄明显相关,U6的欧亚大陆祖先已得到证实。
本研究提供了证据表明M1或其祖先起源于亚洲。M1最早向非洲的扩张发生在西北部而非东部地区;这一早期传播甚至到达了伊比利亚半岛,影响到了巴斯克人。在非洲内外发现的大多数M1a谱系起源于较近的东非。西部和东部的M1谱系都参与了撒哈拉的新石器时代殖民。M1及其北非对应物U6的亚分支年龄和地理分布之间的显著平行性有力地支持了这一情况。最后,当今欧洲大陆和附近岛屿上存在的相当一部分M1a谱系可能有犹太母系血统,而非通常认为的阿拉伯/柏柏尔母系血统。