• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对一级亲属进行结肠癌风险咨询的效果。

Effects of colon cancer risk counseling for first-degree relatives.

作者信息

Glanz Karen, Steffen Alana D, Taglialatela Lauren A

机构信息

Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road Northeast, Room 526, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jul;16(7):1485-91. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0914.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0914
PMID:17627015
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals with a first-degree relative who has had colorectal cancer are at increased risk for colorectal cancer and thus can benefit from early detection. Tailored risk counseling may increase adherence to screening guidelines in these persons. The present study evaluated a culturally sensitive Colon Cancer Risk Counseling (CCRC) intervention for relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

A randomized trial evaluated personalized CCRC sessions with print materials and follow-up phone calls compared with a comparable General Health Counseling (GHC) intervention. One hundred and seventy-six siblings and children of colorectal cancer patients, living in Hawaii, were assessed at baseline and 4 and 12 months after intervention. Physician verification of colorectal cancer screening reports supplemented survey data.

RESULTS

The CCRC intervention had a significant treatment effect at 4 months (13% greater increase than for GHC) that plateaued to a trend at 12 months. For those who were nonadherent at baseline, the CCRC led to a 17% net increase in screening adherence. Participants rated the CCRC intervention better than GHC for the amount and usefulness of new information.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a study design that compared risk counseling to an attention-matched and tailored control condition provided a rigorous test of CCRC that emphasized the relevance of family experience with colorectal cancer. The combination face-to-face, phone, and small media risk counseling intervention for people with a family history of colorectal cancer should be considered for adoption in health care and public health settings.

摘要

背景

有一级亲属患结直肠癌的个体患结直肠癌的风险增加,因此可从早期检测中获益。量身定制的风险咨询可能会提高这些人对筛查指南的依从性。本研究评估了一种针对结直肠癌患者亲属的具有文化敏感性的结肠癌风险咨询(CCRC)干预措施。

方法

一项随机试验评估了个性化CCRC课程,并提供印刷材料和后续电话随访,与类似的一般健康咨询(GHC)干预措施进行比较。对居住在夏威夷的176名结直肠癌患者的兄弟姐妹和子女在基线时以及干预后4个月和12个月进行评估。通过医生对结直肠癌筛查报告的核实来补充调查数据。

结果

CCRC干预在4个月时具有显著的治疗效果(比GHC增加13%),在12个月时趋于平稳并呈一种趋势。对于基线时不依从的人,CCRC使筛查依从性净增加了17%。参与者对CCRC干预的评价在新信息的数量和有用性方面优于GHC。

结论

采用将风险咨询与注意力匹配且量身定制的对照条件进行比较的研究设计,对CCRC进行了严格测试,强调了结直肠癌家族经历的相关性。对于有结直肠癌家族史的人群,应考虑采用面对面、电话和小型媒体相结合的风险咨询干预措施,并应用于医疗保健和公共卫生环境中。

相似文献

1
Effects of colon cancer risk counseling for first-degree relatives.对一级亲属进行结肠癌风险咨询的效果。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jul;16(7):1485-91. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0914.
2
Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counseling and colorectal cancer gene testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups.三个种族有风险亲属中获得遗传咨询和结直肠癌基因检测意向的相关因素。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):329-36.
3
A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives.一项关于两种印刷干预措施以提高一级亲属结肠癌筛查率的随机试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):215-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
4
Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: survey of relatives of colon cancer patients.对结肠癌基因检测的态度:结肠癌患者亲属的调查
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):337-44.
5
Intention to learn results of genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer.了解遗传性结肠癌基因检测结果的意向。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):353-60.
6
Motivational interviewing and screening colonoscopy in high-risk individuals. A randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈联合筛查性结肠镜检查在高危人群中的应用:一项随机对照试验
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jun;101(6):1082-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 May 7.
7
Racial differences in testing motivation and psychological distress following pretest education for BRCA1 gene testing.BRCA1基因检测前教育后检测动机和心理困扰方面的种族差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):361-7.
8
Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: factors predicting test uptake.对结肠癌基因检测的态度:预测检测接受情况的因素
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):345-51.
9
Cancer family history reporting: impact of method and psychosocial factors.癌症家族史报告:方法及社会心理因素的影响
J Genet Couns. 2007 Jun;16(3):373-82. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9076-x. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
10
Evaluation of the needs of male carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who have undergone genetic counseling.对接受过遗传咨询的BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变男性携带者的需求评估。
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Dec;67(6):1494-504. doi: 10.1086/316907. Epub 2000 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and baseline characteristics of an implementation study to increase activity with social incentives: The STEP together trial.一项通过社会激励措施增加身体活动的实施性研究的设计与基线特征:“携手共进”试验
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;153:107909. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107909. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
Tailored recruitment interventions to improve bowel cancer screening in Arabic and Mandarin speaking groups: Modelled cost-effectiveness.针对阿拉伯语和普通话群体的结肠癌筛查的定制招募干预措施:建模成本效益。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0313058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313058. eCollection 2024.
3
Women's decision to adopt or not adopt cervical cancer screening: Application of precaution adoption process model as the theoretical framework.
女性采用或不采用宫颈癌筛查的决定:以预防采用过程模型作为理论框架的应用
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Nov 26;11:363. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1_22. eCollection 2022.
4
Mapping psychosocial interventions in familial colorectal cancer: a rapid systematic review.家族性结直肠癌的心理社会干预措施映射:快速系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09086-8.
5
The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)-a randomised controlled trial.假设的个性化风险信息对苏格兰结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查的知情选择和意向的影响(PERICCS)-一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 20;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01750-3.
6
Improving Screening Uptake among Breast Cancer Survivors and Their First-Degree Relatives at Elevated Risk to Breast Cancer: Results and Implications of a Randomized Study in the State of Georgia.提高乳腺癌幸存者及其乳腺癌高风险一级亲属的筛查率:佐治亚州一项随机研究的结果及意义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;17(3):977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030977.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Two Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening for Those at Increased Risk Based on Family History: Results of a Randomized Trial.基于家族史的风险增加人群的两种干预措施增加结直肠癌筛查的比较效果:一项随机试验的结果。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Jan;29(1):3-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0797. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
8
The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.苏格兰基于结直肠癌筛查的个人化风险信息对比阳性/阴性结果对知情选择和接受结肠镜检查意向的影响(PERICCS)-一项随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6734-0.
9
Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.家族性结直肠癌高危人群的结肠镜筛查邀请。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Oct 26;115(43):715-722. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0715.
10
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.一项评估遗传咨询结果的随机对照试验的系统评价
J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):902-933. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0082-y. Epub 2017 Mar 2.