Suppr超能文献

复制临床资料或与患者分享通信内容会带来更好的护理效果吗?

Does copying clinical or sharing correspondence to patients result in better care?

作者信息

Minhas R

机构信息

CHD Clinical Lead, Medway PCT, Gillingham, Kent, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;61(8):1390-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01432.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Communication between healthcare professionals and patients is suboptimal and the measures to improve patient satisfaction such as sharing correspondence have been reported in different settings.

METHODS

A review of published literature was undertaken to specifically examine patient satisfaction and the professional healthcare provider experience across a range of specialities and settings.

RESULTS

Patients generally report high rates of satisfaction when receiving copies of correspondence although both patient and professional experience within general psychiatry indicates that further consideration may be required before routinely adopting the practice of copying letters in this discipline.

CONCLUSIONS

Dictating letters in the presence of patients can improve patient satisfaction accuracy and modalities such as the use of audio or video recordings may be useful in more specialised settings.

摘要

背景

医疗保健专业人员与患者之间的沟通并不理想,并且在不同环境中已报告了诸如共享信件等提高患者满意度的措施。

方法

对已发表的文献进行综述,以专门研究一系列专业和环境中的患者满意度以及专业医疗服务提供者的体验。

结果

尽管普通精神病学领域的患者和专业人员的体验均表明,在该学科中常规采用复印信件的做法之前可能需要进一步考虑,但患者在收到信件副本时通常报告满意度较高。

结论

当着患者的面口述信件可以提高患者满意度,准确性,并且诸如使用音频或视频记录等方式在更专业的环境中可能会有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验