Helgason Benedikt, Taddei Fulvia, Pálsson Halldór, Schileo Enrico, Cristofolini Luca, Viceconti Marco, Brynjólfsson Sigurthur
University of Iceland, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Iceland.
Med Eng Phys. 2008 May;30(4):444-53. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
The aim of the present study is to compare the results from subject-specific finite element analysis (FEA) of a human femur to experimental measurements, using two different methods for assigning material properties to the FE models. A modified material mapping strategy allowing for spatial variation of material properties within the elements and Young's modulus surface corrections is presented and compared to a more conventional strategy, whereby constant material properties are assigned to each element. The accuracy of the superficial stress-strain predictions was evaluated against experimental results from 13 strain gauges and five different load cases. Both methods predicted stresses with acceptable accuracy (R(2) = 0.92, root mean square error, RMSE < 10%), with the conventional method performing slightly better. The modified method performed better in strain prediction (R(2) = 0.85, RMSE = 23% versus R(2) = 0.79, RMSE = 31%).
本研究的目的是使用两种不同的方法为有限元(FE)模型指定材料属性,将人体股骨的特定受试者有限元分析(FEA)结果与实验测量结果进行比较。提出了一种改进的材料映射策略,该策略允许单元内材料属性的空间变化以及杨氏模量表面校正,并将其与一种更传统的策略进行比较,在传统策略中,为每个单元指定恒定的材料属性。根据13个应变片和五种不同载荷工况的实验结果,评估了表面应力 - 应变预测的准确性。两种方法预测应力的准确性均可接受(R(2) = 0.92,均方根误差,RMSE < 10%),传统方法表现略好。改进方法在应变预测方面表现更好(R(2) = 0.85,RMSE = 23%,而传统方法R(2) = 0.79,RMSE = 31%)。