Koukouzas N, Katsiadakis A, Karlopoulos E, Kakaras E
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas /Institute for Solid Fuels Technology and Applications, Ptolemais, Greece.
Waste Manag. 2008;28(7):1263-75. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.04.011. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
Co-gasification of solid waste and coal is a very attractive and efficient way of generating power, but also an alternative way, apart from conventional technologies such as incineration and landfill, of treating waste materials. The technology of co-gasification can result in very clean power plants using a wide range of solid fuels but there are considerable economic and environmental challenges. The aim of this study is to present the available existing co-gasification techniques and projects for coal and solid wastes and to investigate the techno-economic feasibility, concerning the installation and operation of a 30MW(e) co-gasification power plant based on integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology, using lignite and refuse derived fuel (RDF), in the region of Western Macedonia prefecture (WMP), Greece. The gasification block was based on the British Gas-Lurgi (BGL) gasifier, while the gas clean-up block was based on cold gas purification. The competitive advantages of co-gasification systems can be defined both by the fuel feedstock and production flexibility but also by their environmentally sound operation. It also offers the benefit of commercial application of the process by-products, gasification slag and elemental sulphur. Co-gasification of coal and waste can be performed through parallel or direct gasification. Direct gasification constitutes a viable choice for installations with capacities of more than 350MW(e). Parallel gasification, without extensive treatment of produced gas, is recommended for gasifiers of small to medium size installed in regions where coal-fired power plants operate. The preliminary cost estimation indicated that the establishment of an IGCC RDF/lignite plant in the region of WMP is not profitable, due to high specific capital investment and in spite of the lower fuel supply cost. The technology of co-gasification is not mature enough and therefore high capital requirements are needed in order to set up a direct co-gasification plant. The cost of electricity estimated was not competitive, compared to the prices dominating the Greek electricity market and thus further economic evaluation is required. The project would be acceptable if modular construction of the unit was first adopted near operating power plants, based on parallel co-gasification, and gradually incorporating the remaining process steps (gas purification, power generation) with the aim of eventually establishing a true direct co-gasification plant.
固体废物与煤炭的共气化是一种极具吸引力且高效的发电方式,同时也是除焚烧和填埋等传统技术之外处理废料的一种替代方式。共气化技术能够利用多种固体燃料打造非常清洁的发电厂,但也面临着诸多经济和环境方面的挑战。本研究的目的是介绍现有的煤炭与固体废物共气化技术及项目,并研究在希腊西马其顿地区(WMP)建设一座基于整体煤气化联合循环(IGCC)技术、使用褐煤和衍生燃料(RDF)的30MW(e)共气化发电厂的技术经济可行性。气化模块基于英国燃气-鲁奇(BGL)气化炉,而气体净化模块基于冷煤气净化。共气化系统的竞争优势既可以通过燃料原料和生产灵活性来界定,也可以通过其环境友好型运行来界定。它还为工艺副产品、气化炉渣和元素硫的商业应用带来了好处。煤炭与废料的共气化可以通过并行气化或直接气化来实现。直接气化是容量超过350MW(e)的装置的可行选择。对于安装在燃煤发电厂运营地区的中小型气化炉,建议采用并行气化,且不对产生的气体进行广泛处理。初步成本估算表明,在WMP地区建设一座IGCC RDF/褐煤发电厂不具有盈利性,这是由于特定资本投资过高,尽管燃料供应成本较低。共气化技术还不够成熟,因此建设一座直接共气化工厂需要高额的资金投入。与主导希腊电力市场的价格相比,估算的电力成本缺乏竞争力,因此需要进一步进行经济评估。如果首先在运营中的发电厂附近采用基于并行共气化的装置模块化建设,并逐步纳入其余工艺步骤(气体净化、发电),最终目标是建成一座真正的直接共气化工厂,那么该项目是可以接受的。