Kvam K, Herö H, Oilo G
NIOM, Scandinavian Institute of Dental Materials, Haslum, Norway.
Scand J Dent Res. 1991 Dec;99(6):527-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1991.tb01065.x.
Fracture toughness is regarded as an important property of dental ceramics. The most widely used methods for fracture toughness (KIc) determination are based on assessment of cracks created by hardness indentations. Different formulas have been developed for KIc calculations and all these methods and formulas include empirical factors based on pure ceramics, i.e. non-composite ceramics. These factors may, however, vary for a specified method for materials with different and complex structure. An important question is whether the various proposed methods and formulas lead to approximately the same numerical KIc values or at least to the same ranking of materials. The aim of this work was to compare two indentation methods and various formulas for calculation of KIc values when used on four commercial composite dental ceramics. The two applied methods and the different formulas showed substantial differences in the obtained values for one and the same material and a different ranking of various materials. It is unknown which method gives the most correct KIc values for these ceramic materials.
断裂韧性被视为牙科陶瓷的一项重要性能。测定断裂韧性(KIc)最广泛使用的方法是基于对硬度压痕产生的裂纹进行评估。已开发出不同的公式用于计算KIc,并且所有这些方法和公式都包含基于纯陶瓷(即非复合陶瓷)的经验系数。然而,对于具有不同复杂结构的材料,这些系数可能因特定方法而异。一个重要的问题是,各种提出的方法和公式是否会得出大致相同的KIc数值,或者至少得出相同的材料排名。这项工作的目的是比较两种压痕方法以及用于计算四种商用复合牙科陶瓷KIc值的各种公式。对于同一种材料,两种应用方法和不同公式得出的值存在显著差异,并且各种材料的排名也不同。对于这些陶瓷材料,尚不清楚哪种方法能给出最正确的KIc值。