Scharff James R, Naunheim Keith S
St. Louis University Medical Center, 3635 Vista Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250, USA.
Thorac Surg Clin. 2007 Feb;17(1):81-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.03.006.
Although numerous articles have been written over the past two decades with regard to the treatment of traumatic diaphragmatic hernia, little has actually changed during that time. The ability to make the diagnosis has somewhat improved because of the technologic advances in CT; however, it remains true that the best tool to guide the clinician toward the appropriate diagnosis is a high index of suspicion in patients with blunt or appropriate penetrating trauma. Although laparoscopic or thoracoscopic management of such patients may become prevalent with increasing experience, at present the open approach and simple repair remain the mainstays of management. The patient's survival still depends more on the severity of concomitant nondiaphragmatic injuries and in many cases the diaphragmatic laceration is the least worrisome and least morbid of the patient's injuries. Operative repair results in a good outcome in most patients in the absence of other serious injuries.
尽管在过去二十年里已经发表了大量关于创伤性膈疝治疗的文章,但在此期间实际变化不大。由于CT技术的进步,诊断能力有所提高;然而,对于钝性或穿透性创伤患者,提高警惕仍然是指导临床医生做出正确诊断的最佳方法。虽然随着经验的增加,腹腔镜或胸腔镜治疗此类患者可能会变得普遍,但目前开放手术和简单修补仍是主要的治疗方法。患者的生存仍更多地取决于合并的非膈肌损伤的严重程度,而且在许多情况下,膈肌裂伤是患者损伤中最不令人担忧、发病率最低的。在没有其他严重损伤的情况下,手术修补对大多数患者都能取得良好的效果。