Suppr超能文献

研究生医疗保健教育中的循证实践:一项系统综述。

Evidence based practice in postgraduate healthcare education: a systematic review.

作者信息

Flores-Mateo Gemma, Argimon Josep M

机构信息

Unitat d'Epidemiologia, Salut Pública i Serveis Sanitaris, IDIAPJordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 26;7:119. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-119.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Training in Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) has been widely implemented throughout medical school and residency curricula. The aim of this study is to systematically review studies that assessed the effectiveness of EBP teaching to improve knowledge, skills, attitudes and behavior of postgraduate healthcare workers, and to describe instruments available to evaluate EBP teaching.

METHODS

The design is a systematic review of randomized, non-randomized, and before-after studies. The data sources were MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL and ERIC between 1966 and 2006. Main outcomes were knowledge, skills, attitudes and behavior towards EBP. Standardized effect sizes (E-S) were calculated. The E-S was categorized as small (E-S < 0.2), small to moderate (E-S between 0.2 and 0.5), moderate to large (E-S between 0.51 and 0.79), large (E-S > 0.79). Reliability and validity of instruments for evaluating education were assessed. Studies excluded were those that were not original, performed in medical students, focused on prescribing practices, specific health problems, theoretical reviews of different components of EBP, continuing medical education, and testing the effectiveness of implementing guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies met our inclusion criteria. There were 15 outcomes within the 10 studies for which E-S could be calculated. The E-S ranged from 0.27 (95%CI: -0.05 to 0.59) to 1.32 (95%CI: 1.11 to 1.53). Studies assessing skills, behavior and/or attitudes had a "small to moderate" E-S. Only 1 of the 2 studies assessing knowledge had E-S of 0.57 (95 CI: 0.32 to 0.82) and 2 of the 4 studies that assessed total test score outcomes had "large" E-S. There were 22 instruments used, but only 10 had 2 or more types of validity or reliability evidence.

CONCLUSION

Small improvements in knowledge, skills, attitudes or behavior are noted when measured alone. A large improvement in skills and knowledge in EBP is noted when measured together in a total test score. Very few studies used validated measures tests.

摘要

背景

循证实践(EBP)培训已在医学院校和住院医师培训课程中广泛开展。本研究旨在系统评价评估EBP教学对提高研究生医护人员知识、技能、态度和行为有效性的研究,并描述可用于评估EBP教学的工具。

方法

本研究设计为对随机、非随机及前后对照研究的系统评价。数据来源为1966年至2006年间的MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、CINAHL和ERIC。主要结局为对EBP的知识、技能、态度和行为。计算标准化效应量(E-S)。E-S分为小(E-S<0.2)、小至中等(E-S在0.2至0.5之间)、中等至大(E-S在0.51至0.79之间)、大(E-S>0.79)。评估教育工具的信度和效度。排除的研究包括非原创研究、在医学生中开展的研究、关注处方实践、特定健康问题、EBP不同组成部分的理论综述、继续医学教育以及测试实施指南有效性的研究。

结果

24项研究符合纳入标准。10项研究中有15个结局可计算E-S。E-S范围为0.27(95%CI:-0.05至0.59)至1.32(95%CI:1.11至1.53)。评估技能、行为和/或态度的研究E-S为“小至中等”。评估知识的2项研究中只有1项E-S为0.57(95%CI:0.32至0.82),评估总测试分数结局的4项研究中有2项E-S为“大”。共使用了22种工具,但只有10种有2种或更多类型的效度或信度证据。

结论

单独测量时,知识、技能、态度或行为有小的改善。在总测试分数中一起测量时,EBP的技能和知识有较大改善。很少有研究使用经过验证的测量测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6859/1995214/2f967b2a32dd/1472-6963-7-119-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验