Seitz M, Ackermann A, Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Ruszat R, Bachmann A, Stief C, Reich O, Sroka R
Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität, Campus Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 München.
Urologe A. 2007 Sep;46(9):1242-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-007-1490-7.
Laser therapy of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) remains a challenge for most urologic surgeons. The main goal of laser surgery is to achieve a marked volume reduction and to decrease bladder outlet obstruction and lower urinary tract symptoms with minimal morbidity. Laser therapy encompasses a variety of techniques using different laser wavelengths, application systems, and surgical techniques to achieve contrasting tissue effects. In an in vitro animal model we compared the vaporization and coagulation effects of the potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser, holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser, and diode laser (980 nm).
In an in vitro model using isolated perfused porcine kidneys we investigated the vaporization, the coagulation effect, and the bleeding rate of the KTP, Ho:YAG, and diode lasers on five porcine kidneys each. The application of each laser type was standardized. The area of laser application was 1 cm x 1 cm. The KTP group received an application with 80 W, the Ho:YAG group an application with 10-30 W, and the diode group an application with 30, 60, and 100 W. Hemostasis was measured semiquantitatively. Ablation and coagulation were investigated macro- and microscopically.
Concerning the ablation capacity, the diode laser is most effective (more than fivefold) compared to the KTP and Ho:YAG lasers but demonstrated a rather large coagulation zone of up to tenfold in comparison to the KTP and Ho:YAG lasers. Semiquantitatively, in terms of bleeding rate, all lasers were equivalent in this ex vivo model.
Our very early and limited experience indicates that KTP (80 W) and Ho:YAG (30 W) laser application are equivalent in terms of tissue ablation capacity and coagulation in an experimental setting. The diode laser at 980 nm is superior in terms of ablation capacity but has a large coagulation zone. Concerning the bleeding rate all tested lasers are equivalent in this ex vivo model.
对于大多数泌尿外科医生而言,有症状的良性前列腺增生(BPH)的激光治疗仍是一项挑战。激光手术的主要目标是在发病率最低的情况下实现显著的体积缩小,并减轻膀胱出口梗阻和下尿路症状。激光治疗涵盖了多种技术,使用不同的激光波长、应用系统和手术技术来实现不同的组织效应。在体外动物模型中,我们比较了磷酸钛钾(KTP)激光、钬:钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光和二极管激光(980nm)的汽化和凝固效果。
在使用离体灌注猪肾的体外模型中,我们分别研究了KTP激光、Ho:YAG激光和二极管激光对五个猪肾的汽化、凝固效果和出血率。每种激光类型的应用都进行了标准化。激光照射面积为1cm×1cm。KTP组以80W照射,Ho:YAG组以10 - 30W照射,二极管组分别以30W、60W和100W照射。采用半定量方法测量止血情况。通过宏观和微观观察研究消融和凝固情况。
在消融能力方面,与KTP激光和Ho:YAG激光相比,二极管激光最为有效(超过五倍),但与KTP激光和Ho:YAG激光相比,其凝固区相当大,可达十倍。在这个体外模型中,就出血率而言,通过半定量分析,所有激光效果相当。
我们非常早期且有限的经验表明,在实验环境中,KTP(80W)和Ho:YAG(30W)激光在组织消融能力和凝固方面效果相当。980nm的二极管激光在消融能力方面更具优势,但凝固区较大。在这个体外模型中,就出血率而言,所有测试的激光效果相当。