Cornett M B, Shuntich R
University of West Florida.
Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Oct;73(2):499-507. doi: 10.2466/pms.1991.73.2.499.
175 college undergraduate students completed a questionnaire which contained dating scenarios and questions designed to assess the participants' perceptions about the likelihood that sexual aggression would occur in the described dating situations and how justified sexual aggression would be in those situations. Also included were items to assess self-admitted sexual aggression, self-reported sexual victimization, attitudes toward certain affectionate behaviors, and enjoyment of several magazines including the "soft-core" sexually oriented publication Playboy. Analysis indicated that women made significantly higher estimates of the chances of sexual aggression occurring in the described dating situations. Relative to nonvictimized women, victimized women gave significantly higher estimates of the likelihood of sexual aggression and believed that sexual aggression was significantly more justified. Men rated sexual aggression as significantly more justified in a relationship in which the male had been paying all dating expenses relative to one in which dating expenses were shared. Women's ratings were not significantly different. Also, correlates of self-admitted male sexual aggression included greater rated enjoyment of Playboy magazine and less agreement with an item designed to measure attitudes toward physical affection.
175名大学生完成了一份问卷，其中包含约会场景及问题，旨在评估参与者对所述约会情境中发生性侵犯可能性的看法，以及在这些情境中性侵犯的合理程度。问卷还包括评估自我承认的性侵犯行为、自我报告的性侵犯受害情况、对某些亲昵行为的态度，以及对包括“软色情”性取向刊物《花花公子》在内的几本杂志的喜爱程度的项目。分析表明，女性对所述约会情境中发生性侵犯的可能性估计显著更高。与未受侵害的女性相比，受侵害的女性对性侵犯可能性的估计显著更高，并且认为性侵犯更具合理性。在男性承担所有约会费用而非费用分摊的恋爱关系中，男性认为性侵犯更具合理性。女性的评分没有显著差异。此外，自我承认的男性性侵犯行为的相关因素包括对《花花公子》杂志的更高喜爱评分，以及对一项旨在衡量对身体亲昵态度的项目的较少认同。
