• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《长处与困难问卷》:俄罗斯青少年样本的量表效度验证

The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: scale validation with Russian adolescents.

作者信息

Ruchkin Vladislav, Koposov Roman, Schwab-Stone Mary

机构信息

Yale Child Study Center, New Haven, CT 06520-7900, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2007 Sep;63(9):861-9. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20401.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.20401
PMID:17674399
Abstract

The study aimed at confirming factor structure of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in a general population of Russian adolescents. The SDQ and other psychopathology measures were administered to a representative sample of 13-18-year-old adolescents from Arkhangelsk, Russia (N = 2892). The original factor structure was examined on two randomly selected split-halves of the sample, using structural equation modeling techniques. The fit for all models was good, and when applying increasing constraints across the models, there was not a significant decrease in fit for the random split model. However, the factor loadings and, correspondingly, the scale reliabilities were low. The study concluded that although the Russian SDQ scales do conform reasonably well to a five-factor oblique model, the scales are unsatisfactory in other respects; in its present form, the Russian version of the instrument has inadequate psychometric characteristics. Future research is needed for further scale development.

摘要

该研究旨在确认俄罗斯青少年普通人群中优势与困难问卷(SDQ)的因子结构。对来自俄罗斯阿尔汉格尔斯克的13 - 18岁青少年的代表性样本(N = 2892)进行了SDQ及其他精神病理学测量。使用结构方程建模技术,在随机选取的样本的两个对分样本上检验了原始因子结构。所有模型的拟合度都很好,并且在对模型施加越来越多的限制时,随机对分模型的拟合度没有显著下降。然而,因子载荷以及相应的量表信度较低。该研究得出结论,尽管俄罗斯的SDQ量表在一定程度上合理地符合五因子斜交模型,但在其他方面并不令人满意;以其目前的形式,该工具的俄语版本具有不充分的心理测量特征。未来需要进一步的研究来进行量表的进一步开发。

相似文献

1
The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: scale validation with Russian adolescents.《长处与困难问卷》:俄罗斯青少年样本的量表效度验证
J Clin Psychol. 2007 Sep;63(9):861-9. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20401.
2
The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: Russian validation of the teacher version and comparison of teacher and student reports.《长处和困难问卷》:教师版的俄罗斯验证以及教师报告和学生报告的比较。
J Adolesc. 2012 Feb;35(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
3
Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence.五因素优势与困难问卷(SDQ)在青春期前、青春期早期和晚期的结构效度。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;49(12):1304-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01942.x.
4
[German version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-German)--overview and evaluation of initial validation and normative results].[《长处与困难问卷》德文版(SDQ-德文版)——初步效度验证及常模结果概述与评估]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2003 Sep;52(7):491-502.
5
Evaluating the invariance of the factor structure of the EPQ-R-N among adolescents.评估青少年中艾森克人格问卷修订版简式(EPQ-R-N)的因素结构不变性。
J Pers Assess. 2008 Jan;90(1):66-75. doi: 10.1080/00223890701693777.
6
[Personality assessment with the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory: the 30-Item-Short-Version (NEO-FFI-30)].使用大五人格量表进行人格评估:30项简版(NEO-FFI-30)
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2008 Jun;58(6):238-45. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-986199. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
7
Scale properties of the Japanese version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): a study of infant and school children in community samples.日本版优势与困难问卷(SDQ)的量表特性:社区样本中婴幼儿及学龄儿童的研究
Brain Dev. 2008 Jun;30(6):410-5. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
8
Age and gender differences in social anxiety symptoms during adolescence: the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) as a measure.青少年社交焦虑症状的年龄和性别差异:以社交恐惧量表(SPIN)作为衡量标准
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Dec 3;153(3):261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
9
Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ.德国版父母版优势与困难问卷的常模数据及量表特性
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;13 Suppl 2:II3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-2002-6.
10
[Confirmative study of a French version of the Exercise Dependence Scale-revised with a French population].[针对法国人群对修订后的运动依赖量表法语版的验证性研究]
Encephale. 2008 Oct;34(5):490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Anger and Aggression in Russian Adolescents.俄罗斯青少年的注意力缺陷/多动障碍症状与愤怒及攻击行为
JAACAP Open. 2024 Feb 16;3(1):126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.01.006. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents.《长处与困难问卷》在西澳大利亚青少年筛查与诊断中的效度
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 30;14(21):2433. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212433.
3
Depressive symptoms and anger and aggression in Russian adolescents.
俄罗斯青少年的抑郁症状、愤怒与攻击性
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Nov 16;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00677-w.
4
Spanish normative data of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community-based sample of adolescents: Datos normativos españoles del Cuestionario de capacidades y dificultades (SDQ) en una muestra comunitaria de adolescentes.基于社区的青少年样本中优势与困难问卷的西班牙常模数据:西班牙青少年社区样本中优势与困难问卷(SDQ)的常模数据
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2022 Sep-Dec;22(3):100328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100328. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
5
Generalized and Specific Problematic Internet Use in Central Siberia Adolescents: A School-Based Study of Prevalence, Age-Sex Depending Content Structure, and Comorbidity with Psychosocial Problems.西伯利亚中部青少年的泛化和特定网络使用问题:一项基于学校的流行率、年龄性别相关内容结构以及与心理社会问题共病的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137593.
6
Psycho-Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency.生长激素缺乏症患儿的心理情绪和行为问题
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 23;9:707648. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.707648. eCollection 2021.
7
Oxytocin Pathway Gene () Variants Are Not Related to Psychosocial Characteristics Defined by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Adolescents: A Field School-Based Study.催产素通路基因()变体与青少年优势与困难问卷所定义的社会心理特征无关:一项基于实地学校的研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 9;12:714093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.714093. eCollection 2021.
8
Factor structure of the SDQ and longitudinal associations from pre-school to pre-teen in New Zealand.SDQ 量表的因素结构及其在新西兰从学前到青春期前的纵向关联。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247932. eCollection 2021.
9
Prediction of child and adolescent outcomes with broadband and narrowband dimensions of internalizing and externalizing behavior using the child and adolescent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.使用儿童青少年版 strengths and difficulties questionnaire 对内外向行为的宽带和窄带维度进行儿童和青少年结果预测。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240312. eCollection 2020.
10
Ordinary extraordinary: Elusive group differences in personality and psychological difficulties between STEM-gifted adolescents and their peers.平凡中的非凡:STEM 资优青少年与同龄人在人格和心理困难方面难以捉摸的群体差异。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Mar;91(1):78-100. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12349. Epub 2020 Apr 28.