• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[《长处与困难问卷》德文版(SDQ-德文版)——初步效度验证及常模结果概述与评估]

[German version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-German)--overview and evaluation of initial validation and normative results].

作者信息

Klasen Henrikje, Woerner Wolfgang, Rothenberger Aribert, Goodman Robert

机构信息

Universität Göttingen, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Von-Siebold-Strasse 5, 37075 Göttingen.

出版信息

Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2003 Sep;52(7):491-502.

PMID:14526759
Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a short behavioural screening questionnaire which can be completed in about five minutes by parents and teachers of 4- to 16-year-olds or as self-report by 11- to 16-year-olds. The English original has already been fully evaluated and is widely used in research and clinical practice. The instrument was translated into German in 1997, and several evaluative studies have since been completed. The present paper gives an overview of this novel instrument and summarizes the normative and validation studies to date. A normative study on a field sample of 930 children demonstrated that the distributions of raw scores in the German parent SDQ closely resemble those found in the English version, while a factor analysis of the German data yielded a pattern of loadings which convincingly replicated the original scale structure. Initial validation studies showed that the parent-, teacher-, and self-completed SDQ-Deu correlates well with the considerably longer German versions of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and respective teacher and self-report derivatives (TRF, YSR). Both parent-rated instruments are equally able to distinguish between a community and a clinic sample, and between subgroups with and without specified categories of disorders within a clinic sample. After discussing possible uses of the SDQ-Deu as well as similarities and differences to other scales, we conclude that the German SDQ is just as useful and valid an instrument for many clinical and research purposes as the English original.

摘要

优势与困难问卷(SDQ)是一份简短的行为筛查问卷,4至16岁儿童的家长和教师大约只需五分钟即可完成填写,11至16岁儿童也可自行填写。该问卷的英文原版已经过全面评估,在研究和临床实践中广泛使用。该工具于1997年被翻译成德语,此后完成了多项评估研究。本文对这一新型工具进行了概述,并总结了迄今为止的常模研究和效度研究。一项针对930名儿童的现场样本的常模研究表明,德国版家长SDQ原始分数的分布与英文版非常相似,而对德国数据的因子分析得出的载荷模式令人信服地复制了原始量表结构。初步效度研究表明,家长、教师和自行填写的SDQ-Deu与长得多的德语版儿童行为检查表(CBCL)以及相应的教师和自行报告衍生版本(TRF、YSR)相关性良好。两种家长评定工具都同样能够区分社区样本和临床样本,以及临床样本中有和没有特定类别障碍的亚组。在讨论了SDQ-Deu的可能用途以及与其他量表的异同之后,我们得出结论,德国版SDQ与英文原版一样,在许多临床和研究目的中都是一种有用且有效的工具。

相似文献

1
[German version of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-German)--overview and evaluation of initial validation and normative results].[《长处与困难问卷》德文版(SDQ-德文版)——初步效度验证及常模结果概述与评估]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2003 Sep;52(7):491-502.
2
Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ.德国版父母版优势与困难问卷的常模数据及量表特性
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;13 Suppl 2:II3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-2002-6.
3
Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample.临床样本中父母及教师版优势与困难问卷的效度验证
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;13 Suppl 2:II11-6. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-2003-5.
4
Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting.德国优势与困难问卷自陈版在流行病学背景下的常模数据。
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2018 Nov;46(6):523-533. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000589. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).《优势与困难问卷》(SDQ)荷兰语版本。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;12(6):281-9. doi: 10.1007/s00787-003-0341-3.
6
[Screening childhood behavior problems using short questionnaires I.: the Hungarian version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire].[使用简短问卷筛查儿童行为问题I:优势与困难问卷的匈牙利语版本]
Psychiatr Hung. 2008;23(5):358-65.
7
Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist.比较《长处与困难问卷》(德语版)和《儿童行为检查表》的德语版本。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;9(4):271-6. doi: 10.1007/s007870070030.
8
The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden.优势与困难问卷扩展版作为儿童精神疾病诊断及后续负担的指南。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;40(5):791-9.
9
Validity of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Yemen.《长处与困难问卷》自评版在也门的效度
Saudi Med J. 2004 May;25(5):592-601.
10
[The self-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Austrian field sample].[奥地利实地样本中优势与困难问卷的自我报告版本]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2007 Jul;35(4):265-71. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917.35.4.265.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT): reliability and validation in German children and adolescents based on clinical data.儿童饮食态度测试(ChEAT):基于临床数据对德国儿童和青少年的信效度验证
Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Aug 14;30(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01773-w.
2
Severity of Psychotic-Like Experiences in Help-Seeking German Adolescents: An Exploration of Psychosocial Predictors and Psychological Treatment Outcomes.寻求帮助的德国青少年中类精神病体验的严重程度:心理社会预测因素及心理治疗结果的探索
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Aug;19(8):e70084. doi: 10.1111/eip.70084.
3
Paediatric liver transplantation-improving health care through needs assessment, screening and interventions: protocol for a mixed-methods study.
儿童肝移植——通过需求评估、筛查和干预改善医疗保健:一项混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 1;15(7):e087980. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087980.
4
Sequelae of preterm birth over the lifespan: an exploratory analysis of behavioral problems in childhood and increased risk of major depression and anxiety in adulthood from a cohort study.早产对一生的后遗症:一项队列研究对儿童期行为问题以及成年期重度抑郁和焦虑风险增加的探索性分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jul 8;85:103316. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103316. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Long term patterns and risk factors of loneliness in young adults from an 18-Year longitudinal study in Germany.来自德国一项为期18年的纵向研究中,关于年轻人孤独感的长期模式和风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 5;15(1):24025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08842-1.
6
Psychosocial stress in families of young children after the pandemic: no time to rest.疫情后幼儿家庭中的心理社会压力:无暇休息。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 May 3;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00905-5.
7
Reciprocal impact of mental health and quality of life in children and adolescents-a cross-lagged panel analysis.儿童和青少年心理健康与生活质量的相互影响——交叉滞后面板分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 26;16:1444524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1444524. eCollection 2025.
8
Social stress task with parental support or self-instruction decreases negative cognitions in children with social anxiety disorder.有父母支持或自我指导的社交压力任务可减少社交焦虑障碍儿童的消极认知。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10220. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95032-8.
9
Affective and social pain modulation in children-Experimental evidence using picture viewing.儿童情感与社交疼痛调节——基于图片观看的实验证据
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0313636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313636. eCollection 2024.
10
Longitudinal predictors for internalizing and externalizing symptomatology at age 4: KUNO-Kids cohort study.4岁时内化和外化症状的纵向预测因素:久野儿童队列研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 26;15:1449108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1449108. eCollection 2024.