Dzizinskiĭ A A, Tumak V N, Bidagaev V B
Anesteziol Reanimatol. 1991 Sep-Oct(5):43-5.
Nociceptive effect of conventional and morphine-prolonged epidural analgesia (MPEA) has been compared in 60 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In 30 patients of the test group pain was relieved with MPEA used during 7 days, while in 30 control patients analgesia was performed with the intravenous administration of morphine or fentanyl, or neuroleptanalgesia was used. MPEA was shown to produce a more prompt and reliable anesthetic effect, thus improving the clinical course of AMI. As regards all the parameters, the effect of MPEA was higher compared to conventional analgesia techniques.
在60例急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中比较了传统硬膜外镇痛和吗啡延长硬膜外镇痛(MPEA)的伤害感受效应。试验组30例患者采用MPEA持续镇痛7天以缓解疼痛,而30例对照组患者则通过静脉注射吗啡或芬太尼进行镇痛,或采用神经安定镇痛法。结果显示,MPEA能产生更迅速、可靠的麻醉效果,从而改善AMI的临床病程。就所有参数而言,MPEA的效果优于传统镇痛技术。