Walz F
Gerichtlich-Medizinisches Institut, Universität Zürich.
Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1991;84(2):84-90.
Injuries are still severe on average at Delta-v-values as low as 50 km/h with belted occupants and as low as 30 km/h with struck pedestrians. Therefore, all technical developments improving safety should not blind us to the fact that lowering vehicle speed remains the first priority in injury prevention. Small light weight cars of low energy consumption (e.g. electromobiles) constitute a major occupant safety problem unless advanced safety engineering will be applied. The extensive improvements over the last decades, both in active and passive safety, including newly developed steering systems, anti-blocking brake systems, seat belts, head restraints, etc. however have masked drivers sense and peception of danger. In research and development of sophisticated electronic warning and controlling systems, designed to help in driving, possible secondary effects of risk homoeostasis or compensation of risk reduction have to be taken into account at an early stage. Psychological and ergonomical knowledge has to complement the purely technical and biomechanical approach.
即使在速度低至50公里/小时时,系安全带的驾乘人员所受伤害平均仍很严重;而对于被撞行人,速度低至30公里/小时时伤害仍很严重。因此,所有提高安全性的技术发展不应使我们忽视这样一个事实,即降低车速仍然是预防伤害的首要任务。低能耗的小型轻型汽车(如电动汽车)构成了一个重大的驾乘人员安全问题,除非应用先进的安全工程技术。然而,过去几十年来在主动和被动安全方面的广泛改进,包括新开发的转向系统、防抱死制动系统、安全带、头枕等,却掩盖了驾驶员对危险的感知。在旨在辅助驾驶的复杂电子警告和控制系统的研发中,必须在早期就考虑到风险稳态或风险降低补偿的可能次生效应。心理学和人机工程学知识必须补充纯粹的技术和生物力学方法。