• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[道路交通中的生物力学与伤害预防]

[Biomechanics and injury prevention in road traffic].

作者信息

Walz E

机构信息

Institut für biomedizinische Technik der Universität/ETH Zürich.

出版信息

Ther Umsch. 1997 May;54(5):238-41.

PMID:9244993
Abstract

The main predicting factor for the injury severity is "speed". This fact is predominantly important with regard to the protection of pedestrians and two wheelers. Today's safety features such as new steering and breaking systems, car body construction, seat belts, head restraints and crash helmets etc. let us sometimes overlook the hazards on the road. However, further improvements can be expected from advanced restraint system combinations, reinforced frontal and lateral car structures and padding, perhaps side air bags and automatically adjusted head restraint systems. Collision reconstruction and assessment of causality are needed, e.g., in cases of soft tissue neck injuries, questionable overrunning, walking direction of impacted pedestrians, uncertain belt or helmet wearing etc. Considerable legal problems arise if the causality is judged only from clinical point of view while the important criterion of collision mechanics is not taken into account in acceptable quantitative detail. Therefore it is recommended that determining the causality of a mechanical event should be left to specially trained professionals.

摘要

伤害严重程度的主要预测因素是“速度”。这一事实对于保护行人和两轮车使用者尤为重要。如今的安全特性,如新的转向和制动系统、车身结构、安全带、头枕和防撞头盔等,有时会让我们忽视道路上的危险。然而,先进的约束系统组合、强化的车辆前部和侧面结构以及衬垫,或许还有侧面安全气囊和自动调节头枕系统,有望带来进一步的改进。在诸如软组织颈部损伤、可疑的碾压情况、受撞行人的行走方向、安全带或头盔佩戴情况不确定等案例中,需要进行碰撞重建和因果关系评估。如果仅从临床角度判断因果关系,而未以可接受的定量细节考虑碰撞力学这一重要标准,就会出现相当多的法律问题。因此,建议将机械事件因果关系的判定交由经过专门培训的专业人员来进行。

相似文献

1
[Biomechanics and injury prevention in road traffic].[道路交通中的生物力学与伤害预防]
Ther Umsch. 1997 May;54(5):238-41.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of occupant anthropometry during frontal collisions.正面碰撞中驾乘人员人体测量学的生物力学评估
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2007;43:75-80.
3
[Biomechanical aspects of collisions in street traffic].[道路交通碰撞的生物力学方面]
Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1991;84(2):84-90.
4
Traffic-related injury prevention interventions for low-income countries.针对低收入国家的交通相关伤害预防干预措施。
Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003 Mar-Jun;10(1-2):109-18. doi: 10.1076/icsp.10.1.109.14115.
5
Renal injury mechanisms of motor vehicle collisions: analysis of the crash injury research and engineering network data set.机动车碰撞导致肾损伤的机制:碰撞损伤研究与工程网络数据集分析
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):935-40; discussion 940. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.046. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
6
Kinematics of belted fatalities in frontal collisions: A new approach in deep studies of injury mechanisms.正面碰撞中系安全带死亡者的运动学:损伤机制深入研究的一种新方法。
J Trauma. 2006 Dec;61(6):1506-16. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000210496.52412.02.
7
Method to evaluate the effect of safety belt use by rear seat passengers on the injury severity of front seat occupants.评估后排乘客使用安全带对前排乘客受伤严重程度影响的方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jan;37(1):5-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.05.003.
8
[Whiplash trauma of the cervical vertebrae in traffic: biomechanical and expert-opinion aspects].[交通中颈椎的挥鞭样创伤:生物力学及专家意见方面]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Apr 18;117(16):619-23.
9
Risk of injury associated with the use of seat belts and air bags in motor vehicle crashes.机动车碰撞事故中使用安全带和安全气囊相关的受伤风险。
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(4):290-6.
10
Car-to-pedestrian collision reconstruction with injury as an evaluation index.以损伤为评价指标的车-行人碰撞重建。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation of clinical findings, collision parameters, and psychological factors in the outcome of whiplash associated disorders.挥鞭样损伤相关疾病预后中临床发现、碰撞参数与心理因素的相关性
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 May;75(5):758-64. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.026963.