Suppr超能文献

组合特征对比凸显中的特征特异性相互作用:初级视觉皮层中自下而上凸显图的证据

Feature-specific interactions in salience from combined feature contrasts: evidence for a bottom-up saliency map in V1.

作者信息

Koene Ansgar R, Zhaoping Li

机构信息

Department of Psychology, UCL, London, UK.

出版信息

J Vis. 2007 May 23;7(7):6.1-14. doi: 10.1167/7.7.6.

Abstract

Items that stand out from their surroundings, that is, those that attract attention, are considered to be salient. Salience is generated by input features in many stimulus dimensions, like motion (M), color (C), orientation (O), and others. We focus on bottom-up salience generated by contrast between the feature properties of an item and its surroundings. We compare the singleton search reaction times (RTs) of items that differ from their surroundings in more than one feature (e.g., C + O, denoted as CO) against the RTs of items that differ from their surroundings in only a single feature (e.g., O or C). The measured RTs for the double-feature singletons are compared against "race model" predictions to evaluate whether salience in the double-feature conditions is greater than the salience of either of its feature components. Affirmative answers were found in MO and CO but not in CM. These results are consistent with some V1 neurons being conjunctively selective to MO, others to CO, but almost none to CM. They provide support for the V1 hypothesis of bottom-up salience (Z. Li, 2002) but are contrary to expectation from the "feature summation" hypothesis, in which different stimulus features are initially analyzed independently and subsequently summed to form a single salience map (L. Itti & C. Koch, 2001; C. Koch & S. Ullman, 1985; J. M. Wolfe, K. R. Cave, & S. L. Franzel, 1989).

摘要

从周围环境中凸显出来的项目,即那些吸引注意力的项目,被认为是显著的。显著性是由许多刺激维度中的输入特征产生的,如运动(M)、颜色(C)、方向(O)等。我们关注由项目的特征属性与其周围环境之间的对比所产生的自下而上的显著性。我们将在多个特征上与其周围环境不同的项目(例如,C + O,记为CO)的单一目标搜索反应时间(RTs)与仅在一个特征上与其周围环境不同的项目(例如,O或C)的反应时间进行比较。将双特征单一目标的测量反应时间与“竞争模型”预测进行比较,以评估双特征条件下的显著性是否大于其任何一个特征成分的显著性。在MO和CO中得到了肯定的答案,但在CM中没有。这些结果与一些V1神经元对MO具有联合选择性、其他神经元对CO具有联合选择性,但几乎没有神经元对CM具有联合选择性一致。它们为自下而上显著性的V1假设(Z. Li,2002)提供了支持,但与“特征总和”假设的预期相反,在“特征总和”假设中,不同的刺激特征最初被独立分析,随后相加形成一个单一的显著性图(L. Itti & C. Koch,2001;C. Koch & S. Ullman,1985;J. M. Wolfe,K. R. Cave,& S. L. Franzel,1989)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验