Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research.valuation, 1995 University Avenue, Suite 450, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Health Educ Res. 2010 Aug;25(4):531-41. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq006. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
Reliability and validity of intervention studies are impossible without adequate program fidelity, as it ensures that the intervention was implemented as designed and allows for accurate conclusions about effectiveness (Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium. Health Psychol 2004; 23: 443-51). This study examines the relation between program fidelity with family engagement (i.e. satisfaction and participation) in family-based prevention programs for adolescent alcohol, tobacco or other drug use. Families (n = 381) were those with an 11- to 12-year-old child enrolled in Kaiser Permanente in the San Francisco area. Families participated in one of two programs: Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 (SFP) (Spoth R, Redmond C, Lepper H. Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: one- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 1999; 13: 103-11) or Family Matters (FM) (Bauman KE, Ennett ST. On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: commonly neglected considerations. Addiction 1996; 91: 185-98). Fidelity was assessed by: (i) adherence to the program manual and (ii) quality of implementation. No relationships were found for FM, a self-directed program. For SFP, higher quality scores were related to higher parent satisfaction. Higher adherence scores were related to higher satisfaction for youth, yet surprisingly to lower satisfaction for parents. Parent sessions involve much discussion, and to obtain high adherence scores, health educators were often required to limit this to implement all program activities. Findings highlight a delivery challenge in covering all activities while allowing parents to engage in mutually supportive behavior.
没有充分的方案保真度,干预研究的可靠性和有效性是不可能的,因为它确保干预措施按照设计实施,并允许对有效性做出准确的结论(Bellg AJ、Borrelli B、Resnick B 等人。增强健康行为改变研究中的治疗保真度:来自 NIH 行为改变联盟的最佳实践和建议。健康心理 2004;23:443-51)。本研究考察了方案保真度与家庭参与(即满意度和参与度)之间的关系,以家庭为基础的青少年酒精、烟草或其他药物使用预防计划。家庭(n = 381)是在旧金山地区参加 Kaiser Permanente 的 11 至 12 岁儿童的家庭。家庭参加了以下两个项目之一:强化家庭计划:面向父母和 10-14 岁的青少年(SFP)(Spoth R、Redmond C、Lepper H. 普遍关注家庭的预防性干预对酒精初犯的影响:一项对照研究的一年和两年随访。J Stud Alcohol Suppl 1999;13:103-11)或家庭事务(FM)(Bauman KE、Ennett ST. 同伴影响对青少年药物使用的重要性:经常被忽视的考虑因素。成瘾 1996;91:185-98)。保真度通过以下方式进行评估:(i)遵守程序手册和(ii)实施质量。对于 FM 没有发现关系,这是一个自我指导的项目。对于 SFP,更高的质量分数与家长满意度更高相关。更高的依从性分数与青少年的满意度更高相关,但令人惊讶的是与父母的满意度更低相关。家长会议涉及很多讨论,为了获得更高的依从性分数,健康教育工作者通常需要限制讨论以实施所有的项目活动。研究结果突出了在允许父母进行相互支持的行为的同时涵盖所有活动的提供方面的挑战。