Heymsfield Steven B, Childers Douglas, Beetsch Joel, Allison David B, Pietrobelli Angelo
Merck and Company, Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Nov;103(5):1543-50. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00461.2007. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
Two observations favor the presence of a lower mass-specific resting energy expenditure (REE/weight) in taller adult humans: an earlier report of height (H)-related differences in relative body composition; and a combined model based on Quetelet and Kleiber's classic equations suggesting that REE/weight proportional, variantH(-0.5). This study tested the hypothesis stating that mass-specific REE scales negatively to height with a secondary aim exploration of related associations between height, weight (W), surface area (SA), and REE. Two independent data sets (n = 344 and 884) were evaluated, both with REE measured by indirect calorimetry and the smaller of the two including fat estimates by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results support Quetelet's equation (W proportional, variantH(2)), but Kleiber's equation approached the interspecific mammal form (REE proportional, variantW(0.75)) only after adding adiposity measures to weight and age as REE predictors. REE/weight scaled as H( approximately (-0.5)) in support of the hypothesis with P values ranging from 0.17 to <0.001. REE and SA both scaled as H( approximately 1.5), and REE/SA was nonsignificantly correlated with height in all groups. These observations suggest that adiposity needs to be considered when evaluating the intraspecific scaling of REE to weight; that relative to their weight, taller subjects require a lower energy intake for replacing resting heat losses than shorter subjects; that fasting endurance, approximated as fat mass/REE, increases as H(0.5); and that thermal balance is maintained independent of stature by evident stable associations between resting heat production and capacity of external heat release. These observations have implications for the modeling of adult human energy requirements and associate with anthropological concepts founded on body size.
两项观察结果支持较高的成年人体重特异性静息能量消耗(REE/体重)较低这一观点:较早的一份报告指出相对身体组成存在与身高(H)相关的差异;以及一个基于凯特勒(Quetelet)和克莱伯(Kleiber)经典方程的综合模型,该模型表明REE/体重与H(-0.5)成比例变化。本研究检验了以下假设:体重特异性REE与身高呈负相关,并将探索身高、体重(W)、表面积(SA)和REE之间相关关联作为次要目标。对两个独立数据集(n分别为344和884)进行了评估,两个数据集的REE均通过间接量热法测量,其中较小的数据集还包括通过双能X射线吸收法进行的脂肪估计。结果支持凯特勒方程(W与H(2)成比例变化),但只有在将肥胖指标作为REE预测因子加入体重和年龄后,克莱伯方程才接近种间哺乳动物形式(REE与W(0.75)成比例变化)。REE/体重与H(约为(-0.5))成比例变化,支持了该假设,P值范围为0.17至<0.001。REE和SA均与H(约为1.5)成比例变化,且在所有组中REE/SA与身高的相关性均不显著。这些观察结果表明,在评估REE与体重的种内比例关系时需要考虑肥胖因素;相对于体重而言,较高的受试者比矮的受试者需要更低的能量摄入来补充静息热损失;禁食耐力(近似为脂肪量/REE)随H(0.5)增加;并且通过静息产热与外部散热能力之间明显稳定的关联,热平衡的维持与身高无关。这些观察结果对成年人体能需求建模具有启示意义,并与基于体型的人类学概念相关联。