Global Center for Scientific Affairs, Merck & Co, Rahway, New Jersey, SUA.
Am J Hum Biol. 2010 May-Jun;22(3):301-9. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20985.
Mammalian resting energy expenditure (REE) increases as approximately weight(0.75) while mass-specific REE scales as approximately weight(-0.25). Energy needs for replacing resting losses are thus less relative to weight (W) in large compared with small mammals, a classic observation with biological implications. Human weight scales as approximately height(2) and tall adults thus have a greater weight than their short counterparts. However, it remains unknown if mass-specific energy requirements are less in tall adults; allometric models linking total energy expenditure (TEE) and weight with height (H) are lacking. We tested the hypothesis that mass-specific energy requirements scale inversely to height in adults by evaluating TEE (doubly labeled water) data collected by the National Academy of Sciences. Activity energy expenditure (AEE) was calculated from TEE, REE (indirect calorimetry), and estimated diet-induced energy expenditure. Main analyses focused on nonmorbidly obese subjects < or =50 yrs of age with non-negative AEE values (n = 404), although results were directionally similar for all samples. Allometric models, including age as a covariate, revealed significantly (P < 0.05) greater REE, AEE, and TEE as a function of height (range H(1.5-1.7)) in both men and women. TEE/W scaled negatively to height ( approximately H(-0.7), P < 0.01) with predicted mass-specific TEE (kcal/kg/d) at +/-2 SD for US height lower in tall compared with short men (40.3 vs. 46.5) and women (37.7 vs. 42.7). REE/W also scaled negatively to height in men (P < 0.001) and women (P < 0.01). Results were generally robust across several different analytic strategies. These observations reveal previously unforeseen associations between human stature and energy requirements that have implications for modeling efforts and provide new links to mammalian biology as a whole.
哺乳动物的静息能量消耗(REE)随体重增加约 0.75 倍,而比 REE 则随体重减少约 0.25 倍。因此,与体重相比,大型哺乳动物替换静息损失所需的能量相对较少,这是一个具有生物学意义的经典观察结果。人类体重随身高增加约 2 倍,因此高个子成年人的体重比矮个子成年人更大。然而,高个子成年人的比能需求是否更小仍不清楚;缺乏将总能量消耗(TEE)与身高(H)联系起来的异速生长模型。我们通过评估由美国国家科学院收集的 TEE(双标记水)数据来测试成年人比能需求与身高成反比的假设。从 TEE、REE(间接测热法)和估计的饮食诱导能量消耗中计算出活动能量消耗(AEE)。主要分析集中在非病态肥胖、年龄小于等于 50 岁且 AEE 值为正(n = 404)的受试者上,尽管所有样本的结果方向相似。包括年龄作为协变量的异速生长模型表明,男女的 REE、AEE 和 TEE 均随身高(范围 H(1.5-1.7))显著增加(P < 0.05)。TEE/W 与身高呈负相关(约 H(-0.7),P < 0.01),美国身高较高的男性(40.3 比 46.5)和女性(37.7 比 42.7)的预测比能 TEE(千卡/千克/天)分别低 2 SD。男性(P < 0.001)和女性(P < 0.01)的 REE/W 也与身高呈负相关。在几种不同的分析策略中,结果通常是稳健的。这些观察结果揭示了人类身高与能量需求之间以前未预见的关联,这对建模工作具有影响,并为整个哺乳动物生物学提供了新的联系。