Kasparian Nadine A, Wakefield Claire E, Meiser Bettina
Psychosocial Research Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Level 3 Dickinson Building, 2031, Randwick, Australia.
J Genet Couns. 2007 Dec;16(6):693-712. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9111-6. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
The aim of the present paper was to describe and evaluate many of the measurement scales currently used in genetic counseling outcomes research. A team of three researchers reviewed the available literature and selected a variety of validated instruments suitable for measurement of genetic counseling outcomes. There are numerous scales to assess each of the following outcomes among counselees: satisfaction with genetic counseling; knowledge; decision-making; psychological adjustment; coping; perceived personal control; perceptions of disease risk; and family communication about genetic risk. However, the strengths and limitations inherent to each instrument warrant careful consideration prior to implementation. In the genetic counseling context, scale selection should be undertaken with thought directed towards the characteristics of the research sample (e.g. levels of literacy, culture, medical condition), the practicalities of the research setting (e.g. available funding and resources, time restrictions, researcher expertise), the purpose of the research (i.e. the specific aspect of the genetic counseling experience to be studied), and the science underlying the scale (e.g. theoretical framework, psychometric properties).
本文的目的是描述和评估目前在遗传咨询结果研究中使用的许多测量量表。一个由三名研究人员组成的团队查阅了现有文献,并选择了各种适用于测量遗传咨询结果的经过验证的工具。有许多量表可用于评估受咨询者的以下各项结果:对遗传咨询的满意度;知识水平;决策能力;心理调适;应对方式;感知到的个人控制感;对疾病风险的认知;以及关于遗传风险的家庭沟通。然而,在实施之前,每个工具固有的优势和局限性都值得仔细考虑。在遗传咨询背景下,量表的选择应考虑研究样本的特征(如识字水平、文化、健康状况)、研究环境的实际情况(如可用资金和资源、时间限制、研究人员专业知识)、研究目的(即要研究的遗传咨询经历的具体方面)以及量表背后的科学依据(如理论框架、心理测量特性)。