Aita Kaoruko, Takahashi Miyako, Miyata Hiroaki, Kai Ichiro, Finucane Thomas E
Department of Social Gerontology, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
BMC Geriatr. 2007 Aug 17;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-7-22.
The question of whether to withhold artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) from severely cognitively impaired older adults has remained nearly unexplored in Japan, where provision of ANH is considered standard care. The objective of this study was to identify and analyze factors related to the decision to provide ANH through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in older Japanese adults with severe cognitive impairment.
Retrospective, in-depth interviews with thirty physicians experienced in the care of older, bed-ridden, non-communicative patients with severe cognitive impairment. Interview content included questions about factors influencing the decision to provide or withhold ANH, concerns and dilemmas concerning ANH and the choice of PEG feeding as an ANH method. The process of data collection and analysis followed the Grounded Theory approach.
Data analysis identified five factors that influence Japanese physicians' decision to provide ANH through PEG tubes: (1) the national health insurance system that allows elderly patients to become long-term hospital in-patients; (2) legal barriers with regard to limiting treatment, including the risk of prosecution; (3) emotional barriers, especially abhorrence of death by 'starvation'; (4) cultural values that promote family-oriented end-of-life decision making; and (5) reimbursement-related factors involved in the choice of PEG. However, a small number of physicians did offer patients' families the option of withholding ANH. These physicians shared certain characteristics, such as a different perception of ANH and repeated communication with families concerning end-of-life care. These qualities were found to reduce some of the effects of the factors that favor provision of ANH.
The framework of Japan's medical-legal system unintentionally provides many physicians an incentive to routinely offer ANH for this patient group through PEG tubes. It seems apparent that end-of-life education should be provided to medical providers in Japan to change the automatic assumption that ANH must be provided.
在日本,对于是否停止为重度认知障碍的老年人提供人工营养和水分补充(ANH)这一问题几乎未被探讨过,因为在日本,提供ANH被视为标准治疗。本研究的目的是识别和分析与为重度认知障碍的日本老年人通过经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)提供ANH的决策相关的因素。
对30名在照顾老年、卧床、无法交流的重度认知障碍患者方面经验丰富的医生进行回顾性深入访谈。访谈内容包括关于影响提供或停止ANH决策的因素、对ANH的担忧和困境以及选择PEG喂养作为ANH方法的问题。数据收集和分析过程遵循扎根理论方法。
数据分析确定了影响日本医生通过PEG管提供ANH决策的五个因素:(1)允许老年患者成为长期住院患者的国家医疗保险系统;(2)限制治疗的法律障碍,包括被起诉的风险;(3)情感障碍,特别是对“饥饿”死亡的厌恶;(4)促进以家庭为导向的临终决策的文化价值观;(5)选择PEG时涉及的报销相关因素。然而,少数医生确实为患者家属提供了停止ANH的选择。这些医生具有某些共同特征,例如对ANH的不同看法以及就临终护理与家属反复沟通。发现这些特质减少了一些倾向于提供ANH的因素的影响。
日本医疗法律体系的框架无意中促使许多医生常规地通过PEG管为该患者群体提供ANH。显然,应该为日本的医疗服务提供者提供临终教育,以改变必须提供ANH的自动假设。