Suppr超能文献

临床环境中视力测量的随机测量误差。

Random measurement error in visual acuity measurement in clinical settings.

作者信息

Leinonen Jaakko, Laakkonen Eero, Laatikainen Leila

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005 Jun;83(3):328-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00469.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the random measurement error in visual acuity (VA) determination in the clinical environment in cataractous, pseudophakic and healthy eyes.

METHODS

The VAs of patients referred for cataract surgery or consultation by ophthalmic professionals were re-examined and the VA results for distance using projector acuity charts were compared. Refractive errors were also remeasured. A total of 99 eyes (41 cataractous, 36 pseudophakic and 22 healthy eyes) were examined. The healthy comparison group consisted of hospital staff. Only one eye of each person and eyes with Snellen VAs of 0.3-1.3 (logMAR 0.52 to - 0.11) were included. The mean time interval between the first and second examinations was 45 days.

RESULTS

The estimated standard deviation of measurement error (SDME) of repeated VA measurements of all eyes was logMAR 0.06. Eyes with the lowest VA (0.3-0.45) had the largest variability (SDME logMAR 0.09), and eyes with VA > or = 0.7 had the smallest (SDME logMAR 0.04). The variability may be partly explained by the line size progression in lower VAs, partly by the difference in the remeasurement of the refractive error. The difference in the average VA between examinations 1 and 2 (logMAR 0.15 versus 0.12) was considered to be of some interest because it indicates that some learning effect is possible.

CONCLUSION

Visual acuity results in clinical settings have a certain degree of inherent variability. In this series variability ranged from SDME logMAR 0.04 (eyes with good vision) to logMAR 0.09 (in the lower vision group) in the Snellen VA range of 0.3-1.3. Changes should be judged with caution, especially in cases of decreased VA.

摘要

目的

评估在临床环境中,对白内障患者、人工晶状体眼患者及健康受试者进行视力测定时的随机测量误差。

方法

对眼科专业人员转诊来进行白内障手术或咨询的患者的视力进行重新检查,并比较使用投影仪视力表测得的远视力结果。同时重新测量屈光不正情况。共检查了99只眼(41只白内障眼、36只人工晶状体眼和22只健康眼)。健康对照组由医院工作人员组成。每人仅检查一只眼,且纳入Snellen视力为0.3 - 1.3(logMAR 0.52至 - 0.11)的眼睛。首次检查与第二次检查的平均时间间隔为45天。

结果

所有眼睛重复视力测量的估计测量误差标准差(SDME)为logMAR 0.06。视力最差(0.3 - 0.45)的眼睛变异性最大(SDME logMAR 0.09),而视力≥0.7的眼睛变异性最小(SDME logMAR 0.04)。这种变异性部分可由较低视力时行间距的变化来解释,部分可由屈光不正重新测量的差异来解释。第1次和第2次检查之间平均视力的差异(logMAR 0.15对0.12)值得关注,因为这表明可能存在某种学习效应。

结论

临床环境中的视力结果存在一定程度的固有变异性。在本系列研究中,在Snellen视力范围0.3 - 1.3内,变异性范围从SDME logMAR 0.04(视力良好的眼睛)到logMAR 0.09(低视力组)。判断视力变化时应谨慎,尤其是在视力下降的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验