Suppr超能文献

书写痉挛中的感觉整合:与对照组比较及肉毒杆菌毒素效果评估

Sensory integration in writer's cramp: comparison with controls and evaluation of botulinum toxin effect.

作者信息

Contarino M F, Kruisdijk J J M, Koster L, Ongerboer de Visser B W, Speelman J D, Koelman J H T M

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, H2-222, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.004. Epub 2007 Aug 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Abnormal temporal and spatial sensory integration have been described in mixed groups of dystonic patients. We tested somatosensory integration and the effect of botulinum toxin (BoNT) in patients with writer's cramp (WC).

METHODS

Median and ulnar SEPs were recorded in 29 WC patients and in 10 controls. We performed: individual and simultaneous stimulation of median and ulnar nerves (MU) and paired stimulation of median nerve at interstimulus-interval (ISI) of 40 and 100 ms. All the trials were repeated after blinded randomized treatment with placebo or BoNT-A.

RESULTS

We found no differences between patients and controls in standard SEPs. Spatial (except for N9) and temporal suppression after ISI 40 were present in both groups for all the waves; after ISI 100, suppression was present only for N70. There were no differences between patients and controls. After BoNT-A treatment, no changes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast with previous findings in heterogeneous dystonic groups, and although some studies suggest impairment of spatial and temporal sensory discrimination in patients with focal dystonia, in our large cohort of patients with WC we found no evidence of abnormal somatosensory integration investigated by means of SEPs and no changes in somatosensory variables after BoNT-A treatment.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings may suggest pathophysiological differences between focal and generalized dystonia, and may also point to an inferior sensitivity of SEPs in detecting abnormalities in sensory discrimination as compared to methods based on subjective discrimination.

摘要

目的

在肌张力障碍患者的混合组中已描述了异常的时空感觉整合。我们测试了书写痉挛(WC)患者的体感整合及肉毒杆菌毒素(BoNT)的作用。

方法

记录了29例WC患者和10例对照者的正中神经和尺神经体感诱发电位(SEP)。我们进行了:正中神经和尺神经的单独及同时刺激(MU),以及在40和100毫秒的刺激间隔(ISI)下对正中神经进行配对刺激。所有试验在使用安慰剂或BoNT - A进行盲法随机治疗后重复进行。

结果

我们发现患者和对照者在标准SEP方面没有差异。两组在ISI为40时所有波均存在空间(除N9外)和时间抑制;在ISI为100时,仅N70存在抑制。患者和对照者之间没有差异。BoNT - A治疗后未观察到变化。

结论

与之前在异质性肌张力障碍组中的发现相反,尽管一些研究表明局灶性肌张力障碍患者存在时空感觉辨别受损,但在我们的大量WC患者队列中,我们未发现通过SEP研究的体感整合异常的证据,且BoNT - A治疗后体感变量也未发生变化。

意义

我们的发现可能提示局灶性和全身性肌张力障碍之间的病理生理差异,也可能表明与基于主观辨别的方法相比,SEP在检测感觉辨别异常方面的敏感性较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验