Woods Douglas W, Himle Michael B, Miltenberger Raymond G, Carr James E, Osmon David C, Karsten Amanda M, Jostad Candice, Bosch Amanda
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2441 E. Hartford Avenue, Garland Hall Room 224, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Feb;36(2):237-45. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9173-9. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
Chronic tic disorders are characterized by involuntary motor and vocal tics, which are influenced by contextual factors. Recent research has shown that (a) children can suppress tics for brief periods of time, (b) suppression is enhanced when programmed reinforcement is provided for tic-free intervals, and (c) short periods of suppression do not result in a paradoxical "rebound" in tic frequency when active suppression has ceased. The current study extended existing research in three important ways. First, we examined whether tic suppression ability decreased as suppression duration increased from 5 to 25 to 40 min. Second, we examined post-suppression tic frequency to test whether longer periods of suppression were more likely to be associated with a rebound effect. Finally, we explored neuropsychological predictors of tic suppression. Thirteen children with Tourette syndrome or a chronic tic disorder completed the study. Results showed that (a) tic suppression was sustained for all of the suppression durations, (b) rebound effects were not observed following any of the suppression durations, and (c) ability to suppress was correlated with omission, but not commission errors on a continuous performance task. Implications of these findings are discussed.
慢性抽动障碍的特征是不自主的运动和发声抽动,这些抽动会受到情境因素的影响。最近的研究表明:(a)儿童能够在短时间内抑制抽动;(b)当为无抽动间隔提供程序性强化时,抑制作用会增强;(c)当主动抑制停止时,短时间的抑制不会导致抽动频率出现矛盾的“反弹”。当前的研究在三个重要方面扩展了现有研究。首先,我们研究了随着抑制持续时间从5分钟增加到25分钟再到40分钟,抽动抑制能力是否会下降。其次,我们检查了抑制后抽动频率,以测试更长时间的抑制是否更有可能与反弹效应相关。最后,我们探索了抽动抑制的神经心理学预测因素。13名患有妥瑞氏症或慢性抽动障碍的儿童完成了这项研究。结果表明:(a)在所有抑制持续时间内,抽动抑制都能持续;(b)在任何抑制持续时间后均未观察到反弹效应;(c)抑制能力与遗漏错误相关,但与连续执行任务中的执行错误无关。本文讨论了这些发现的意义。