Suppr超能文献

在衣原体感染率较低的女性中,比较Clearview衣原体检测法、衣原体酶免疫测定法和细胞培养法对沙眼衣原体的检测情况。

Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia test, Chlamydiazyme, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with a low prevalence of infection.

作者信息

Skulnick M, Small G W, Simor A E, Low D E, Khosid H, Fraser S, Chua R

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Sep;29(9):2086-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.9.2086-2088.1991.

Abstract

Two antigen detection systems, Clearview Chlamydia (Unipath Ltd., Bedford, United Kingdom) and Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.), were compared with culture for the diagnosis of chlamydia infection in women attending gynecological clinics. Chlamydia trachomatis was isolated from 43 (4.5%) of the 965 women tested. In comparison with tissue culture, the Clearview Chlamydia and Chlamydiazyme tests had sensitivities of 79.0 and 74.4%, respectively, and both had a specificity of 99.6%. The results show that the Clearview Chlamydia test is comparable to Chlamydiazyme for the detection of C. trachomatis from endocervical specimens in a population with a low prevalence of infection.

摘要

比较了两种抗原检测系统Clearview衣原体检测试剂盒(英国贝德福德Unipath有限公司)和衣原体酶免疫检测试剂盒(美国伊利诺伊州北芝加哥雅培实验室)与培养法在诊断妇科门诊就诊女性衣原体感染中的应用。在接受检测的965名女性中,有43名(4.5%)分离出沙眼衣原体。与组织培养相比,Clearview衣原体检测试剂盒和衣原体酶免疫检测试剂盒的敏感性分别为79.0%和74.4%,两者的特异性均为99.6%。结果表明,在感染率较低的人群中,从宫颈标本中检测沙眼衣原体时,Clearview衣原体检测试剂盒与衣原体酶免疫检测试剂盒相当。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Point of care diagnostics for sexually transmitted infections: perspectives and advances.性传播感染的即时诊断:观点与进展
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Jun;12(6):657-72. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.880651. Epub 2014 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

9
Quantitative culture of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis.宫颈沙眼衣原体定量培养
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Apr;28(4):774-80. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.4.774-780.1990.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验