Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病筛查患者的体验:ADDITION(剑桥)随机对照试验中的前瞻性定性研究。

Patients' experiences of screening for type 2 diabetes: prospective qualitative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Eborall Helen, Davies Richard, Kinmonth Ann-Louise, Griffin Simon, Lawton Julia

机构信息

General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR.

出版信息

BMJ. 2007 Sep 8;335(7618):490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39308.392176.BE. Epub 2007 Aug 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To provide insight into factors that contribute to the anxiety reported in a quantitative study of the psychological effect of screening for type 2 diabetes. To explore expectations of and reactions to the screening experience of patients with positive, negative, and intermediate results.

DESIGN

Prospective qualitative interview study of patients attending a screening programme for type 2 diabetes.

SETTING

Seven general practices in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial in the east of England.

PARTICIPANTS

23 participants (aged 50-69) attending different stages in the screening process.

RESULTS

Participants' perceptions changed as they progressed through the screening programme; the stepwise process seemed to help them adjust psychologically. The first screening test was typically considered unimportant and was attended with no thought about its implications. By the final diagnostic test, type 2 diabetes was considered a strong possibility, albeit a "mild" form. After diagnosis, people with screen detected type 2 diabetes tended to downplay its importance and talked confidently about their plans to control it. Participants with intermediate results seemed uncertain about their diagnosis, and those who screened negative were largely unaware of their remaining high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This study helps in understanding the limited psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes quantified previously, in particular by the quantitative substudy of ADDITION (Cambridge). The findings have implications for implementing such a screening programme in terms of timing and content.

摘要

目的

深入了解在2型糖尿病筛查心理效应的定量研究中报告的焦虑相关因素。探讨筛查结果为阳性、阴性和中间结果的患者对筛查体验的期望和反应。

设计

对参加2型糖尿病筛查项目的患者进行前瞻性定性访谈研究。

背景

英格兰东部ADDITION(剑桥)试验中的7家普通诊所。

参与者

23名参与者(年龄在50 - 69岁之间)处于筛查过程的不同阶段。

结果

参与者在筛查项目过程中的认知发生了变化;逐步的过程似乎有助于他们在心理上进行调整。第一次筛查测试通常被认为不重要,参加时没有考虑其影响。到最后诊断测试时,2型糖尿病被认为很有可能,尽管是“轻度”形式。诊断后,筛查出2型糖尿病的人倾向于淡化其重要性,并自信地谈论他们控制病情的计划。筛查结果为中间结果的参与者似乎对自己的诊断不确定,而筛查为阴性的参与者大多没有意识到自己仍处于高风险中。

结论

本研究有助于理解先前量化的2型糖尿病筛查有限的心理影响,特别是ADDITION(剑桥)试验的定量子研究。这些发现对在时间安排和内容方面实施此类筛查项目具有启示意义。

相似文献

10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Diabetes risk score: towards earlier detection of type 2 diabetes in general practice.糖尿病风险评分:助力在全科医疗中更早检测出2型糖尿病
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000 May-Jun;16(3):164-71. doi: 10.1002/1520-7560(200005/06)16:3<164::aid-dmrr103>3.0.co;2-r.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验