Allendorf John, DiGorgi Mary, Spanknebel Kathryn, Inabnet William, Chabot John, Logerfo Paul
Department of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168 Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
World J Surg. 2007 Nov;31(11):2075-80. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9068-5. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
Bilateral neck exploration has been the standard approach for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Improved localization studies and the availability of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring have challenged the necessity of four-gland exploration. In this series we report a single surgeon's experience with bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism in an effort to establish benchmark outcomes from which to evaluate minimally invasive protocols.
The charts of 1112 consecutive patients who underwent neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism by a single surgeon over a 17-year period were reviewed. All patients underwent bilateral neck exploration under either general (n = 264) or local (n = 848) anesthesia.
The overall cure rate was 97.4% with a complication rate of 3.4%. Morbidity included recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (0.2%), postoperative bleeding (0.8%), and transient hypocalcemia (1.8%). There was no mortality. Overall mean operating time was 52.5 +/- 30.2 minutes. A single gland was removed in 78.4% of patients, and 22.3% of patients underwent concomitant thyroidectomy. The cure rate was lower for patients undergoing reexploration (89.2% vs. 97.9%, p < 0.05). Choice of anesthetic approach did not affect the cure or complication rate. The overall conversion rate from local to general anesthesia was 1.5%. Patients undergoing general anesthesia were operated on earlier in the series and were less likely to be managed on an ambulatory basis (local 87.5% vs. general 38.4%, p < 0.05). During the last 5 years of the series, more than 90% of patients underwent exploration under local anesthesia.
This large modern series of neck explorations for primary hyperparathyroidism confirms the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the bilateral approach. It further demonstrates that individual surgeons can achieve outcomes equivalent to those with four-gland explorations under local anesthesia.
双侧颈部探查一直是原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者的标准治疗方法。定位研究的改进以及术中甲状旁腺激素监测的应用对进行全腺体探查的必要性提出了挑战。在本系列研究中,我们报告了一位外科医生对原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者进行双侧颈部探查的经验,旨在建立用于评估微创方案的基准结果。
回顾了一位外科医生在17年期间连续为1112例原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者进行颈部探查的病历。所有患者均在全身麻醉(n = 264)或局部麻醉(n = 848)下接受双侧颈部探查。
总体治愈率为97.4%,并发症发生率为3.4%。并发症包括喉返神经损伤(0.2%)、术后出血(0.8%)和短暂性低钙血症(1.8%)。无死亡病例。总体平均手术时间为52.5±30.2分钟。78.4%的患者切除了单个腺体,22.3%的患者同时进行了甲状腺切除术。再次探查患者的治愈率较低(89.2%对97.9%,p < 0.05)。麻醉方法的选择不影响治愈率或并发症发生率。局部麻醉转为全身麻醉的总体转换率为1.5%。接受全身麻醉的患者在系列研究中手术时间较早,且不太可能在门诊接受治疗(局部麻醉87.5%对全身麻醉38.4%,p < 0.05)。在该系列研究的最后5年中,超过90%的患者在局部麻醉下进行探查。
这一大型现代原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进颈部探查系列研究证实了双侧手术方法的安全性、可行性和有效性。它进一步表明,个体外科医生在局部麻醉下可取得与全腺体探查相当的结果。