McKenzie S
Neonatal Unit, Rush Green Hospital, Romford, Essex.
Arch Dis Child. 1991 Dec;66(12):1416-20. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.12.1416.
The observation that babies with troublesome crying improve quickly in hospital suggested that, if true, a common, quickly reversible, factor may operate. Histories from parents of such babies suggest that much work goes into trying to console them. It is hypothesised that this may lead to excessive stimulation and the improvement seen in hospital reflects a reduction in stimulation. Two studies were undertaken. (1) Carers were asked to agree to randomisation of their infants to hospital or home management. Those at home were advised to reduce stimulation. A 10 point questionnaire was used to describe distress in mothers of subjects and age matched controls. (2) A randomised controlled study compared advice to reduce stimulation with an empathic interview using a +5 to -5 scale to chart change. In the first study too few subjects agreed to randomisation and thus a rigorous study to validate the observation could not proceed. There was good evidence, however, that crying improved. Results from the home group justified the second study. The median distress score for subjects was 7/10 and for controls 3/10 (p less than 0.001). In the second study at seven days, 18/22 subjects given advice scored +2 or better on the change chart for crying, compared with 7/20 of those who did not receive advice (p less than 0.01). After the latter received advice 79% improved (95% confidence interval 61 to 97%). For babies under 12 weeks, the customary upper limit for a diagnosis of colic, 14/15 subjects advised improved compared with 6/12 who were not advised (p less than 0.02). These studies have shown that infants with troublesome crying admitted to hospital seem to improve quickly as do those whose carers are advised to reduce stimulation.
患有持续性哭闹的婴儿在医院里很快就有所改善,这一观察结果表明,如果情况属实,可能存在一个常见的、可迅速逆转的因素在起作用。这些婴儿的父母提供的病史表明,为了安抚他们需要付出很多努力。据推测,这可能会导致过度刺激,而在医院里看到的改善反映了刺激的减少。为此进行了两项研究。(1)要求护理人员同意将他们的婴儿随机分配到住院治疗组或居家治疗组。建议居家治疗的婴儿减少刺激。使用一份10分制问卷来描述受试婴儿的母亲以及年龄匹配的对照组母亲的苦恼程度。(2)一项随机对照研究将减少刺激的建议与使用从+5到-5的量表进行的共情访谈进行比较,以记录变化情况。在第一项研究中,同意随机分组的受试者太少,因此无法进行一项严格的研究来验证这一观察结果。然而,有充分的证据表明哭闹情况有所改善。居家组的结果为第二项研究提供了依据。受试婴儿母亲的苦恼得分中位数为7/10,对照组为3/10(p<0.001)。在第二项研究中,到第7天时,接受建议的22名受试婴儿中有18名在哭闹变化量表上的得分达到+2或更高,而未接受建议的20名婴儿中只有7名(p<0.01)。后者接受建议后,79%的婴儿情况有所改善(95%置信区间为61%至97%)。对于12周以下(通常为诊断腹绞痛的年龄上限)的婴儿,接受建议的15名受试婴儿中有14名情况改善,而未接受建议的12名婴儿中只有6名(p<0.02)。这些研究表明,住院的持续性哭闹婴儿似乎改善很快,那些护理人员被建议减少刺激的婴儿也是如此。