O'Day Danton H
Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Fall;6(3):217-23. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-01-0002.
Previous work has established that a narrated animation is more effective at communicating a complex biological process (signal transduction) than the equivalent graphic with figure legend. To my knowledge, no study has been done in any subject area on the effectiveness of animations versus graphics in the long-term retention of information, a primary and critical issue in studies of teaching and learning. In this study, involving 393 student responses, three different animations and two graphics-one with and one lacking a legend-were used to determine the long-term retention of information. The results show that students retain more information 21 d after viewing an animation without narration compared with an equivalent graphic whether or not that graphic had a legend. Students' comments provide additional insight into the value of animations in the pedagogical process, and suggestions for future work are proposed.
先前的研究已经证实,与配有图注的等效图形相比,配有旁白的动画在传达复杂的生物过程(信号转导)方面更有效。据我所知,在任何学科领域,尚未有关于动画与图形在信息长期留存方面有效性的研究,而信息长期留存是教学研究中的一个主要且关键的问题。在这项有393名学生参与反馈的研究中,使用了三种不同的动画和两种图形(一种有图注,一种没有图注)来确定信息的长期留存情况。结果表明,与等效图形(无论该图形是否有图注)相比,学生在观看无旁白动画21天后能记住更多信息。学生的评论为动画在教学过程中的价值提供了更多见解,并提出了未来工作的建议。