Kinlaw C Ryan, Kurtz-Costes Beth
Duke University, Center for Child and Family Policy, Box 90545 Durham, NC 27708-0545, USA.
J Gen Psychol. 2007 Jul;134(3):295-311. doi: 10.3200/GENP.134.3.295-312.
The authors tested a developmental model of children's theories about intelligence in kindergarten, second grade, and fourth grade children by using paper-and-pencil maze tasks. Older children were more likely than younger children to espouse learning goals (e.g., that they preferred difficult mazes to improve their skill), and less likely to espouse performance goals (e.g., that they preferred easy mazes to be successful). Children in all 3 age groups reported stronger beliefs in the malleability of intelligence than the stability of intelligence. In general, the results supported the authors' hypotheses about developmental change in children's theory-like conceptions of intelligence: Beliefs, goals, and motivation were related in expected ways for second and fourth graders more than for kindergartners. The authors discussed contextual influences on children's beliefs and the development of children's conceptualizations of intelligence.
作者通过使用纸笔迷宫任务,对幼儿园、二年级和四年级儿童关于智力的理论发展模型进行了测试。年龄较大的儿童比年龄较小的儿童更倾向于支持学习目标(例如,他们更喜欢难度大的迷宫来提高技能),而支持成绩目标(例如,他们更喜欢简单的迷宫以获得成功)的可能性较小。所有三个年龄组的儿童都报告称,他们更相信智力的可塑性而非稳定性。总体而言,研究结果支持了作者关于儿童类似理论的智力概念发展变化的假设:与幼儿园儿童相比,二、四年级学生的信念、目标和动机之间的关联更符合预期。作者讨论了情境对儿童信念的影响以及儿童智力概念的发展。