Gutheil Grant, Gelman Susan A, Klein Eileen, Michos Katherine, Kelaita Kara
Nazareth College, Psychology Center, 4245 East Avenue, Rochester, NY 14618-3790, USA.
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):366-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Sep 6.
Humans construe their environment as composed largely of discrete individuals, which are also members of kinds (e.g., trees, cars, and people). On what basis do young children determine individual identity? How important are featural properties (e.g., physical appearance, name) relative to spatiotemporal history? Two studies examined the relative importance of these factors in preschoolers' and adults' identity judgments. Participants were shown pairs of individuals who looked identical but differed in their spatiotemporal history (e.g., two physically distinct but identical Winnie-the-Pooh dolls), and were asked whether both members in the pair would have access to knowledge that had been supplied to only one of the pairs. The results provide clear support for spatiotemporal history as the primary basis of identity judgments in both preschoolers and adults, and further place issues of identity within the broader cognitive framework of psychological essentialism.
人类将他们的环境主要理解为由离散的个体组成,这些个体也是类别(如树木、汽车和人)的成员。幼儿基于什么来确定个体身份?相对于时空历史而言,特征属性(如外貌、名字)有多重要?两项研究考察了这些因素在学龄前儿童和成年人身份判断中的相对重要性。向参与者展示一对看起来一模一样但时空历史不同的个体(例如两个身体上不同但一模一样的小熊维尼玩偶),并询问这对个体中的两个是否都能获取仅提供给其中一个的知识。结果明确支持时空历史是学龄前儿童和成年人身份判断的主要依据,并进一步将身份问题置于心理本质主义这一更广泛的认知框架内。