Suppr超能文献

追踪个体:发展心理学的见解

Keeping Track of Individuals: Insights from Developmental Psychology.

作者信息

Krøjgaard Peter

机构信息

Center on Autobiographical Memory Research, Department of Psychology and the Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 9, Building 1350, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Jun;50(2):264-76. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9340-4.

Abstract

According to Mammen and Mironenko (2015) our sensitivity to objects' history (i.e., objects' whereabouts across space and time) has been neglected in much of contemporary psychology. In this paper I present evidence from a developmental psychological perspective indicating that although the terminology is different, some research concerning these important issues has actually been conducted. First, research primarily under the heading 'essentialism' has shown that children are sensitive to at least some aspects of an object's history. Second, research on object individuation has revealed that for infants spatiotemporal information appears to have primacy relative to featural information. Finally, research on episodic development has provided evidence that a continuous (hence historical) sense of 'me' may be a necessary, although not sufficient, precondition in order to have episodic memories. It is argued that the available evidence converges, which only underscores the relevance and importance of the issues raised by Mammen and Mironenko (2015).

摘要

根据马门和米罗年科(2015年)的观点,在当代心理学的许多研究中,我们对物体历史(即物体在空间和时间中的下落轨迹)的敏感性被忽视了。在本文中,我从发展心理学的角度提供证据表明,尽管术语不同,但实际上已经有一些关于这些重要问题的研究。首先,主要在“本质主义”标题下进行的研究表明,儿童对物体历史的至少某些方面是敏感的。其次,关于物体个体化的研究表明,对于婴儿来说,时空信息相对于特征信息似乎具有首要地位。最后,关于情节发展的研究提供了证据,即连续的(因此是有历史的)“自我”感可能是拥有情节记忆的必要前提,尽管不是充分前提。有人认为,现有证据相互印证,这只凸显了马门和米罗年科(2015年)提出的问题的相关性和重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验