Lingen Mark W, Kalmar John R, Karrison Theodore, Speight Paul M
Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2008 Jan;44(1):10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Sep 6.
Historically, the screening of patients for signs of oral cancer and precancerous lesions has relied upon the conventional oral examination. A variety of commercial diagnostic aids and adjunctive techniques are available to potentially assist in the screening of healthy patients for evidence of otherwise occult cancerous change or to assess the biologic potential of clinically abnormal mucosal lesions. This manuscript systematically and critically examines the literature associated with current oral cancer screening and case-finding aids or adjuncts such as toluidine blue, brush cytology, tissue reflectance and autofluorescence. The characteristics of an ideal screening test are outlined and the authors pose several questions for clinicians and scientists to consider in the evaluation of current and future studies of oral cancer detection and diagnosis. Although the increased public awareness of oral cancer made possible by the marketing of recently-introduced screening adjuncts is commendable, the tantalizing implication that such technologies may improve detection of oral cancers and precancers beyond conventional oral examination alone has yet to be rigorously confirmed.
从历史上看,对患者进行口腔癌及癌前病变体征的筛查一直依赖于传统的口腔检查。现在有多种商业诊断辅助工具和辅助技术,它们有可能帮助筛查健康患者,以发现原本隐匿的癌变迹象,或评估临床异常黏膜病变的生物学潜能。本文系统且批判性地审视了与当前口腔癌筛查以及病例发现辅助手段或辅助技术(如甲苯胺蓝、刷片细胞学、组织反射率和自体荧光)相关的文献。文中概述了理想筛查测试的特点,作者还提出了几个问题,供临床医生和科学家在评估当前及未来口腔癌检测与诊断研究时思考。尽管最近推出的筛查辅助手段的营销提高了公众对口腔癌的认识,这值得称赞,但这些技术可能比单纯的传统口腔检查更能提高口腔癌和癌前病变的检测率这一诱人说法,尚未得到严格证实。